Last night on “Left Jab” on Sirius Left talk radio, the hosts interviewed activist lawyer Kevin Zeese. Zeese was at an action against the Chamber of Commerce sponsored by stopthechamber.com, but he has also been very active in the health care reform battle. He was one of the Baucus 8, the first 8 people arrested in Senator Baucus’ Finance Committee hearings on health care back in May. I heard him speak at the recent “Mad as Hell Doctors” rally in Washington DC.

One of the hosts challenged Zeese with the conventional wisdom aka company propaganda that “Rahm was around in 1994” when health care reform didn’t even get a vote which some think is the reason why the Democrats lost Congress in the November elections. And since Rahm’s and the White House’s main concern is winning elections, getting a bill any bill however meager or flawed, is the objective.

Zeese said that like many generals “Rahm was fighting the last war” (I might quibble with Zeese about Rahm being a general). Zeese said that the Clinton plan was a mess. It was more complicated than the current bloated bills in the House and Senate. A single payer type of bill was not debated then as it is not debated now. The Clinton plan was another attempt at keeping our for-profit, ludicrously expensive, inefficient and cruel health system going. Zeese makes the case that passing a bad or weak bill will do the opposite of what Rahm thinks will happen. Anger by average Americans at being betrayed by Washington by allowing then to be bilked even more by the sickness industry will show itself in losses, perhaps huge losses for those in charge aka The Democrats.

I would add that there is theory that is not discussed enough for apparent reasons. That theory goes that passing NAFTA alienated and disheartened liberal politicians and really angered rank and file Democrats who either voted Republican in 1994, but more likely sat the 1994 election out. I call myself and people like me FDR type Democrats, Classic Coke Democrats. Many of these Classics sat home in 1994. So the New Fangled Coke Dems aka the triangulating aka pragmatic aka yes men and women and Eisenhower/Rockefeller Republicans started taking over the old party of labor in earnest.

Kevin Zeese is another reason not to lump all lawyers together as leaches and slick fancy talkers. People’s advocates are worth their weight in gold. We see this with Elizabeth Warren’s righteous crusade to protect consumers, formerly known as citizens. We see it with Brooksley Born and her fight to stem corruption in banking.

Trial lawyers have to be clear and concise. Successful ones need to make their cases to juries with clear explanation of their clients’ cause. They must explain things well.

Politicians use rhetoric or the gift of gab if they are good at it or folksy phrases, bad jokes, and manufactured (by pollsters) weasel phrases if they are average. What most of them do is not explain a damn thing. Even Barack Obama during the campaign said that he wished he had more trial experience instead of spending most of his time in the classroom or researching. Yeh, a lecturer is a whole different kind of cat than a trial lawyer.
Unfortunately, we need a strong people’s advocate, a lobbyist for the people. They are out there; Zeese in the streets, Warren in her committee, Grayson in the House, Spitzer on the news shows. Our job is to keep highlighting them and not the company men and women who have sold out to the corrupt corporate culture.