During the demand for a bailout Former Secretary of the Treasury Hank Paulson was in "constant telephone contact with Goldman chief Banfein" When the hearings for the "bailout, rescue plan, recovery" plan were taking place I kept thinking Christ Paulson is the inside heist guy with a gun pointed at the heads of our Reps saying "give me the $ or I will pull the trigger"
McClatchey has been investigating Goldman Sachs for five months They have been digging into how (can you say Hank Paulson) Goldman Sachs not only stayed afloat but how they got out before the fall and have profited big time from the bailout
How Goldman secretly bet on the U.S. housing crash
" WASHINGTON — In 2006 and 2007, Goldman Sachs Group peddled more than $40 billion in securities backed by at least 200,000 risky home mortgages, but never told the buyers it was secretly betting that a sharp drop in U.S. housing prices would send the value of those securities plummeting.
Goldman’s sales and its clandestine wagers, completed at the brink of the housing market meltdown, enabled the nation’s premier investment bank to pass most of its potential losses to others before a flood of mortgage defaults staggered the U.S. and global economies.
Only later did investors discover that what Goldman had promoted as triple-A rated investments were closer to junk.
Now, pension funds, insurance companies, labor unions and foreign financial institutions that bought those dicey mortgage securities are facing large losses, and a five-month McClatchy investigation has found that Goldman’s failure to disclose that it made secret, exotic bets on an imminent housing crash may have violated securities laws."
Link below





17 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
Article and video clip
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/77791.html
Amy Goodman always on it
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/4/sachs
Low Road to High Finance: McClatchy Expose Reveals How Goldman Sachs Sold Off Billions in Mortgage Securities After Anticipating Housing Collapse
Gordongs-web
A five-month investigation by McClatchy Newspapers has revealed that Goldman Sachs made secret bets against the housing market while simultaneously selling off billions in soon-to-be worthless securities. In 2006 and 2007, the bank reportedly peddled more than $40 billion in securities backed by at least 200,000 risky home mortgages, but never told the buyers it was secretly betting that a sharp drop in US housing prices would send the value of those securities plummeting. We speak to McClatchy reporter Greg Gordon. [includes rush transcript]
More
Why did blue-chip Goldman take a walk on subprime’s wild side?
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/100/story/77852.html
With Corzine losing in New Jersey. Was looking for when Corzine was head man at Goldman Sachs
http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/04/a-brief-history-of-goldman-sachs-heads/
Hank Paulson’s call logs during Sept 2008
http://www.andrewrosssorkin.com/?p=88
Derivatives are mostly bets.
I put down $1 on a bet that if “X” occurs, I’ll get $30 in return.
That requires controlling information and maintaining secrecy to ensure that I have the inside info that I need to ‘make’ $29 for the dollar that I put ‘on the line’.
Oh, and if you think that I was supposed to have $29 in reserve just in case I lost the bet, go talk to Tim Geithner or Hank Paulson. Because I didn’t have $29 in reserve.
So I made the US taxpayers cover it.
‘Corrupt’ is too genteel, to polite, too tame a term for what has occurred.
I’ll do my utmost to pass along the McClatchy links.
Thanks, Leen.
BTW: To hear Andrew Ross Sorkin tell it, it’s even worse than we can imagine.
Those bastards who put us on the hook to cover all those $29 they didn’t have in reserve to cover the bets they lost? They think of themselves as ’survivors’, and they feel ‘embattled’.
Which seriously reduces the odds they’ll get a f*cking clue.
And why should they get a clue, when we’re covering their asses?
And Paulson seemed to be the inside heist guy holding the gun to their heads saying “give me the keys to the treasury now and no one will get hurt”
Hey, how many people has Obama arrested over that whole heist?
It’s sad when this type of news gets so few comments.
It’s being drowned out by the “news” on FDL. – quantity over quality IMHO
The McClatchy report seems pretty damn important
Really is confusing when the Obama administration brought a group of the financial crisis thugs on board.
Good work, Leen.
I try to link stuff about this Grand Heist wherever I think I can at least squeeze it in without disturbing an on-going thread. There is so much occupying our attention–life and death stuff like health care, death and depravity stuff like torture, damnable stuff like the ongoing strangulation of our Constitution and Bill of Rights, and so on. To me, this heist, conducted in broad daylight (though the details of secret goings-on are coming to light), blessed by Congress and encouraged by the O-Team, is just as pressing.
Keep fightin’!
So many fat cat thugs running around tough to keep up
A week or two ago, someone (forget who-sowwy) posted an announcement that a special feature coming up would be on labor exclusively. I keep waiting for it to appear and what it will be called (the person asked for our suggestions; being old as dirt I suggested “Solidarity”). Maybe another special feature on High
JinksFinance will appear before too long. This stuff is too dirty, too deep and too pervasive to be ignored. Just my opinion, of course.uhm, dude, he put them in charge of the Treasury Department of our country. It would be funny if it wasn’t so sad, maybe
Remarkable how little attention even after only a year people are paying to the things that are coming out.