Anyone who thought David Brooks is more enlightened than Rush Limbaugh, Fox News or Karl Rove should reconsider after Brooks accused the media of offering politically correct "therapy" to excuse the actions of Major Hasan at Ft. Hood while suppressing the narrative that the killings justify America’s global war against Islam.
Brooks tries to avoid the right wing framing abyss, but in Rush to Therapy, he can’t help it:
There was a national rush to therapy. Hasan was a loner who had trouble finding a wife and socializing with his neighbors.
This response was understandable. It’s important to tamp down vengeful hatreds in moments of passion. But it was also patronizing. Public commentators assumed the air of kindergarten teachers who had to protect their children from thinking certain impermissible and intolerant thoughts. If public commentary wasn’t carefully policed, the assumption seemed to be, then the great mass of unwashed yahoos in Middle America would go off on a racist rampage.
Worse, it absolved Hasan — before the real evidence was in — of his responsibility.
What gibberish. There was no effort to "absolve" anyone; there was a justifiable search for motive and connections. But Brooks has already decided these issues:
Most people select stories that lead toward cooperation and goodness. But over the past few decades a malevolent narrative has emerged.
That narrative has emerged on the fringes of the Muslim world. It is a narrative that sees human history as a war between Islam on the one side and Christianity and Judaism on the other. This narrative causes its adherents to shrink their circle of concern. They don’t see others as fully human. They come to believe others can be blamelessly murdered and that, in fact, it is admirable to do so.
This narrative is embraced by a small minority. But it has caused incredible amounts of suffering within the Muslim world, in Israel, in the U.S. and elsewhere. With their suicide bombings and terrorist acts, adherents to this narrative have made themselves central to global politics. They are the ones who go into crowded rooms, shout “Allahu akbar,” or “God is great,” and then start murdering.
Brooks implies there is only one malevolent narrative, and it’s caused exclusively by extreme Islamists who portray non-Islamists as subhuman. Thus, only "they" would invoke God as they murder the innocents.
Where has Brooks been as America’s Christians and Jews invoke analogous justifications for bombing civilians in multiple Islamic countries? Is he really not aware that religious extremists in the US repeatedly de-humunize Muslims — they’re just "collateral damage" — and push policies that result in their slaughter? Where is the narrative that acknowledges this reality and then places Major Hasan’s killings in that context?
But Brooks apparently can’t recognize the implications of what he concedes:
The conversation in the first few days after the massacre was well intentioned, but it suggested a willful flight from reality. It ignored the fact that the war narrative of the struggle against Islam is the central feature of American foreign policy. It ignored the fact that this narrative can be embraced by a self-radicalizing individual in the U.S. as much as by groups in Tehran, Gaza or Kandahar.
So after describing the war-against-Islam narrative as evil, Brooks is literally saying that the US is at war with Islam — not just against murdering extremists, but with Islam — and that war is the "central feature of American foreign policy." And that’s exactly what Rush Limbaugh, the neocons, the religious right in America and Fox News want Americans to embrace.
I propose that Brooks lead the whole bunch of America’s religious zealots and let them have their religious war . . . only take it to Mars and leave the rest of us Earthlings out of their collective insanity.
Update: Glenn Greenwald, Denying Responsibility for the wars one cheers on
TPM, Scrubbed: Call for backlash against Muslims . . .
Related:
Think Progress, Pat Robertson Says Islam is not a religion and Muslims should be treated as fascists
Think Progress, General Casey warns against anti-Muslim backlash
Media Matters, Fox News anchor: Muslims have to understand being profiled
Gawker, How the Ft. Hood shooter brings radical cleric, right wing nuts together
The Hill, Top GOP recruit says "enemy is infiltrating our military"
Spencer Ackerman, Don’t do al-Qaeda’s work for it
FDL/Jim White, Lieberman to whip up anti-Muslim hysteria





68 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
Gee! Religious Wars have dominated this planet from the time religion started.
To think we aren’t in a religious war, when Islam peaches those not of the faith are infidelsis a bit neurotic. All Islam may not be fanatics, but to be true to their faith this has to be in at least the back of their minds.
It also preaches that it’s their duty to make the whole world believers.
This doesn’t seen to take into acount freedom of religion for others.
What even they say to our faces, does not say what they think in their minds.
I think an argument could be made that Brooks could easily be the little smiley-face on Jonah Goldberg’s book.
Yes, Brooks isn’t a facist. But he is an apologist for the empire, here in its waning days. In this piece he drew the veil a little too thin, and both you and Greenwald have pounded him.
To what effect, though, I wonder.
David Brooks is a propagandist. He links vague, emotionally laden images with vague, emotionally laden concepts in his writing in an attempt to cause his readers to react emotionally and irrationally to real-world situations.
I’m positive that if you were to review the history of other religions you would find just as many examples of extreme messages as you would find in Islam. The vast majority of humans are fair, decent people who want to live in peace and see their children prosper…..regardless of religious or national affiliation.
No religion has a monopoly in terms of being used by those in power to incite war or foster fear, anger and hatred against another people. Railing against Islam will only further illustrate our hypocrisy.
Scarecrow/all
glenn Greenwald has a few things to say about Brooks latest
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/index.html?story=/opinion/greenwald/2009/11/10/brooks
Denying responsibility for the wars one cheers on
“David Brooks’ column today perfectly illustrates what lies at the core of our political discourse: namely, self-loving tribalistic blindness laced with a pathological refusal to accept responsibility for one’s actions. Brooks claims there is a unique evil that one finds in the “fringes of the Muslim world”:”
Glenn hits the hypocrites on the head again
“But Brooks himself was a vehement, vicious advocate for the attack on Iraq, which caused this:
The 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq has resulted in the deaths of many Iraqi civilians . . . Many international organizations, governments and non-governmental organizations have counted excess civilian casualties using such methods; however all have reported different numbers. Reports range from 128,000 to 1,033,000.
That’s at least 128,000 innocent human beings — at least — whose lives were eradicated by the war Brooks repeatedly cheered on. It also resulted in this: “More than 4 million Iraqis have now been displaced by violence in the country.” But Brooks accuses Islamic fanatics — but not himself — of “causing incredible amounts of suffering.”
Brooks also justified the Israeli attack on Gaza, including its worst excesses — a war that wiped out the lives of 1,400 Palestinians (including 252 children under the age of 16) and that entailed “the shooting of [Gazan] civilians with white flags, the firing of white phosphorus shells and charges that Israeli soldiers used Palestinian men as human shields,” all of which, according to a U.N. investigation, were “the result of deliberate guidance issued to soldiers.” He also cheered on the Israeli bombing campaign of Lebanon and derided those calling for a cease-fire, even as the war wiped out more than 1,000 Lebanese people, at least 300 of whom were women and children, during which “Israeli warplanes also targeted many moving vehicles that turned out to be carrying only civilians trying to flee the conflict.” And Brooks is now demanding escalation of the war in yet another Muslim country, this one in Afghanistan — making it the fourth separate war on Muslims he’s cheered on in the last six years alone.”
Best thing I have read all day. Glen Greenwald hits another one out of the park and cuts Brooks off at the knees
How many liberals and gays do you think get
to espouse their views in the Muslim world?
And that’s your justification for bigotry? Lame, lame, lame.
here in new york a former student kept the principle hostage for a few hours
his religion is not part of the discussion for some reason…that reason is he’s probably not a muslim
good point sambot
those people who think they are doing it right should move there, will you be moving soon?
those people who think that’s rediculous should certainly not be using them as an example for how we do things there
Dreams of that world make Limpy Limbaugh and the Republics get all misty eyed.
If you folx had your way, none of them would be able to espouse their views in THIS country! The main difference is that there are many Islamic countries where their fundamentalists are actually in charge. Here, that’s not the case, although they THINK they are and they try to force their will on the rest of us regardless. Besides, if you want to blame all Muslims for the actions of a small minority, you’ll have to blame all Christians for the killing of abortion doctors and the Oklahoma City bombing. It makes just as much sense.
OK, who forgot to change Bobo’s diapers?
it seems like bin laden is fulfilling his most wet dreams as people like sambot try to tell everyone we need to abandon our principles
these people actually believe what their pupeteers tell them to say
amazing
Again,
How many liberals and gays do you think get
to espouse their views in the Muslim world?
Can I get an answer?
thanks for the link. I’ve added it to the post.
Why did he join the military in the first place ?
Did he not realize that they fight wars?
Or did he just want a check?
If you want to get to heaven, you have to be a true believer. Since there are many versions of true believer religions, and you can only belong to one, it follows that everybody is going to hell.
Which seems to be the case politically, anyway!
Why? It’s a stupid, loaded question from a known troll. What makes you think you deserve any such consideration?
Ask him, troll.
Answer is ZERO!
Yet, you rush to defend when you would be the
first targets if they had their way. Not too bright!
Awesome. So as long as there’s one country out there that we’re better than, we’re the best!
USA USA USA!
Good thing that the Bush Wing of Hell is so large.
Already did, [Edited by Moderator. Do not personally insult other commenters.]
Therefore, let me, before the real evidence is in, decide that I know what really happened. Because I am a white, war-mongering American, and if my belief is not right it soon will be.
Can’t you have a discussion without name calling? Which by the
way is prohibited on this board. If you don’t know just
say so.
Rush to defend what, exactly?
As usual, wingnuts don’t use actual nouns or transitive verbs, because then they would have to explain exactly what they are talking about. Which they can’t. Because they don’t even know.
You aren’t here for a “discussion.” You’re here to troll.
How could it not be his responsibility? He pulled the
trigger.
Wingnuts don’t use actual nouns and transitive verbs because it invites the wrath of the wingnut nation.
Who said he didn’t?
Point made!
Oh, sure, now you’re asking for reading comprehension.
On the contrary, most sane people are saying that Major Hasan pulled the trigger. It’s David Brooks and Michelle Malkin and Joe Lieberman who are trying to turn the abstraction of Islamic fanaticism into a corporeal being that pulled the trigger, so we can drop bombs on it (and any innocent civilians who happens to be nearby)(but we’ll be forgiven for that, of course)(because other cultures don’t cry when their kids are killed like we do).
By the way, where in Islamic teachings is it
stated that you need to go to a strip joint before
you slaughter innocent people? It kills me that these
people are described as devout Muslims. Must be reading
a different Islamic book.
scarecrow, if you get a chance, check out this kagro story.
I hope there will be more of these summaries after the dust settles.
You know, anything substantive I might say is completely dissipated when I see the lemur-like visage of BoBo. That he continues to be paid well to sit around in a suit and squeak out inane and mean-spirited propaganda is fundamentally disheartening.
Speaking of Holy Joe, unless he (rightfully) loses his chairmanship, he’ll be running the committee investigating this thing. Now is as good a time as any to strip him of his gavel. Yes, he’ll filibuster HCR in retaliation, but he is going to do that anyway, so what (other than a dirtbag, of course) has been lost? What else can he do, go on Fox News? (He does that already, too…)
Brooks is a fatuous twit and not very bright.
That said: The more I know of this Nidal Hasan I become impressed that his story is a textbook on the process of radicalization of a young man in this “greatest of all the nations of all time.” I think he does represent all but the final link to a more organized group such as Al Quaeda..I would imagine he would have been the perfect recruit.
The fact that this went on in very public view noted by many in a country in lockdown to the point of paranoia of “terrorism” has to prove how little the people in charge of intelligence and surveillance understand about the the process and its actors.
Yes, I saw David’s excellent essay earlier. Should serve as a wakeup call.
And that right there should let you know that the shootings are the work of a disturbed individual and not part of some Islamic conspiracy.
Brooks with his projection erased:
I noticed that too.
Why did so many conservatives wet their pants and cower after 9/11? Abandon our country’s principles, advocate torture, advocate spying on our own citizens, etc.?
I think they’re little, vengeful, and not very smart.
And fearful. Fear drives out the ability to think clearly.
So why does some yo-yo cleric praise his actions
and the rest of the Muslim world stay silent? Where
is the outrage?
What the fuck are you talking about? Muslims have talked themselves blue in the face condemning these shootings. You can learn that if you don’t rely on Faux News (We Distort–You Recite.)
I guess after Pearl Harbor we should have blamed it on
a few runaway airplane pilots and stayed at home.
So Fort Hood = Pearl Harbor!
Smarter trolls, please.
Every heard of 9/11?
Well, we certainly don’t want them to work up to an aggregate average IQ.
9/11 is not the topic of this blog. Thanks for playing, though.
Just checked the front pages of CNN, Huff Post and
FireDog and I don’t see one article about the top
Islamic Clerics apologizing for the attacks.
Keep looking, troll.
Dodger!
Oh, so Fort Hood == 9/11!
Wow.
Dodger times 2.
Humor and parody respect no ideological boundaries. So let’s see who thinks a “Dancing Bin-Laden doll is teh funny… Oh, a Gazan…
Dancing Bin Laden Doll, Souvenir Kitsch Chronicle Gaza History
It nice to know that hell on earth still has a functioning novelty shop. I can’t wait for the franchise to come to an ecologically devastated city near me. Got DDT?
Yeah, where is the outrage?
There are some specific lessons there that need to be learned–or at least that I need to learn. Why did single payer get thrown away so easily and soon? How to fight smarter–etc. etc.
Actually the PNAC’ers hoped for a cataclysmic and catastrophic Pearl Harbor type event. Then they could justify their Oil Wars. Wolfowitz promised the Iraq war would be paid for with the Oil we would steal from them. Of course the 9-11 hijackers were financed by Pakistan and Saudi Arabia with the help of the the Riggs Bank in DC to launder the funds. These are all “false flag ops” to keep the Military Industrial Complex in business.
The neo-cons supported the Taliban and Bin Laden until 9-11. On 9-11 George Bush Sr. was meeting with Bin Laden’s brother. Another Muslim, in the US Military, Ali Mohamed was helping Bin Laden for years with US approval. US government officials knew ahead of time, about the both WTC attacks, and the African Embassy Bombings. Apparently US officials were familiar with Hasan’s links to Al CIAda also.
The neo-con wars are all phony. It is all about the Oil.
OK, now you’ve gone off the road and into the ditch.
Not responding to the Pearl Harbor attack AND the invasions of Thailand, British Malaya, Guam, Wake Island AND the declaration of war by Japan against the United States? After the Japanese government went to the trouble of planning all that in one day, not to respond would have been, well, aloof, don’t you think?
Actually this was on CNN the day of the shooting and documents various Islamic groups racing to denounce the shooter. …So you’re wrong. http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/05/muslims.fort.hood/
So Bobo if Hitler killed a bunch of Jews and tortured them it would be wrong for a Jewish Solder in the German army to frag some of his fellow solders. (The Jewish solder in the German army is a hypothetical)
I’m gay and I live in a Muslim country. And I’ve come to accept the fact that here, as everywhere, people are more than the sum of their opinions. Very good, kind, decent people often hold crazy opinions. So if I ask a Muslim what he thinks is going to happen to gay people, he’ll probably say we’ll burn in hell. But on a day to day basis, the same person can be the kindest most generous and thoughtful person imaginable in a very disinterested way, without giving a thought to religion. I’ve also met people with enlightened, politically evolved opinions who turn on their fellow human beings with great cruelty when it is expedient for them to do so. Life is complicated.
While I lead a very closeted life here, it’s about what I’d expect gay life to have been in the 50’s in the US. That doesn’t make people here inhuman or bad. I have a great respect for the decency and goodness people show me and show each other here.
“This narrative is embraced by a small minority. But it has caused incredible amounts of suffering within the Muslim world, in Israel, in the U.S. and elsewhere. With their suicide bombings and terrorist acts, adherents to this narrative have made themselves central to global politics. They are the ones who go into crowded rooms, shout “Allahu akbar,” or “God is great,” and then start murdering.”
Yet our narrative is embraced by the vast majority when our President tells the world “God bless our troops and God bless the United States of America” right before we unleash “shock and awe” on a Muslim civilian population.
I rail against all religions that wish to push their beliefs on others. We have several in this Country other than Islam that have real prolems in My mind.
If I were a Cheney-bot thrall-troll I’d be righteously pissed too.
Think about it… all those long-oil positions looked great during the run-up to war against Iran. But those wiley Goldman traders knew it was a sucker’s bet and shorted the oil futures down down down once it hit an all-time high of $147.
Imagine how you’d feel looking at your $150 calls turning to shit…
Cheney’s oil play looked good while the goopers goosestepped to war in the middle east. But when the tide turned against the Red White and Black, hoo-boy, did Big Oil take a licken.
Just a wild ass guess here but a $100 drop in price per barrel multiplied by 75 million bpd == $7.5 billion per day!!
Since July of ‘08 the Oil-ogopolists have suffered trillions in revenue reduction from the peak price. And you thought Cheney was mad at Bush because he didn’t pardon Scooter!
Who screwed the pooch under durinng BushCo’s watch?? Muslim apologists? Dirty fucking hippies? Goldman Sachs execs?
Golly-Gee Mr. Wizard… when can we get back to war and righteously high oil prices? I know, let’s get Bo-Bo Blowhard to turn back the clock to the glory days of the Crusades! Then we’ll be rich again! Yay for the dark side, yay for bad guys! Yay for peak oil!!
No wonder Blo-Blo wants to quietly drink himself into a stupor with dead people…
It is the Big Oil apologists that we need to berate, isolate, investigate, recriminate and abjugate. I think Frank33 @58 figured it out…
I don’t know I’m qualified to have a convincing answer on that. When I started writing on the reform issues, sp had already been taken off the table, and there never seemed to be a coherent political strategy to prevent it from happening in the first place or reversing it afterwards. The most obvious lesson I see is that it’s not enough to be right, to have the best proposal, or logical reasons to support it — in fact, other factors matter more, once it gets into the political process. That’s very disconcerting for those who try to deal in the logic and merits. Jane recognized this and put together a political blocking strategy, and so far it’s working, but we’re not done.
I don’t want to offend anyone here. I’m an agnostic so, as an outsider who is mistrustful of what I can not see. That said, this “battle of the religions” comes off as selfserving. A bravado of my god is better than yours. It’s truely tragic that extremist who would strap bombs to themselves and heads for the nearest crowd or every bit as vile as those who would walk into a church and murder a physican. Most disgraceful and “subhuman” to use Brooks’ word against him, is the use of god as justification. I will admit something to all of you. I wasn’t always non-believer. But, as I got older (49), I began to wonder about all the awful things that happen in our world, many times to innocent people and thought, how could there possibly be god that would allow all this pain and suffering. Then, I thought maybe it’s the devil but, now I realize it’s neither. It’s people. We, or they are responsible.
Nidal Hasan bought a $1000 plus small powerful pistol in July. Payed for his apartment up front. According to witnesses calming and carefully decided who to shoot. Every move seems to me to be calculated. Perhaps even giving away his Koran in a way that would have a certain effect. Al Qaeda, and I don’t know about the Taliban, particularly attack locals willing to translate for the US. Thus Nidal Hasan succeeded to make it difficult for Arabic translators of olive complexion, Muslim or not, to do their job without being surrounded by tension.
Blaming Islam for him, is a little like blaming the hippies for Charles Mansion.
for more detail see,
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/20185
http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/author/richardkanepa