On November 17th 2008, Catherine Rampell posted a piece online that was essentially an effort to “clarify” the CAR study (2003 Center for Automotive Research study) statistics as well as its’ recent follow-up report which was released on Election Day. The CAR study and it’s recent update, address the contributions of the automotive industry to the U.S. economy. The article attempted to help the reader understand that the real number of employees possibly affected nationally by the big three folding, are not “that bad” but are still of some concern.

Rampell, unfortunately, does not think about “who” might be reading her article and in a tongue–and-cheek manner, peppers her article with illustrations such as:

“The failure of General Motors, for example, wouldn’t eliminate the entire car-wash industry.”

And then adds:

“Car-washing jobs are primarily dependent on Americans’ continued demand for automobiles — whether they’re from Detroit or Nagoya — and not the operations of any one automobile company. If a foreign company could swoop in to fill that demand with minimal disruption, then, theoretically, car-wash employees would keep their jobs.”

(my bold)

Luckily, the economic depth and “issue related” strategies regarding one or all three auto manufacturers folding, was cogently addressed ,not by Rampell, but by her readers. Many comments following the post were filled with information Rampell has missed in many of her posts regarding the auto industry, not just this November 17th post.

The first comment was able to show the depth of industries affected, no matter what tier in the supply chain:

“I don’t think you really understand what it means for so many people to be out of work for two to three years. I don’t think you really understand that so many companies, big and small, will be toppled by this, particularly given the timing. My company makes equipment used in semiconductor manufacturing and industrial gas production. Sounds like they have nothing to do with GM, right? Wrong. The cars are full of chips. Gas is used to calibrate engine emissions and in all matter of processes, as well as to make steel for cars. It goes on and on. This is not the time to allow a major industrial player to go belly-up. The impact will be far worse than Lehman Bros.”
Lisa Bergson

Another reader wrote:

“how many jobs did we salvage in the finance and insurance industries with the bailout of AIG and other Wall Street firms?…and why was that OK and salvaging the auto industry isn’t?
why are the jobs of people who actually produce something and add real value to the economy not as valuable as the jobs of people who don’t produce anything, don’t create any real economic value, and lose other people’s money on bets bound to fail, i.e. the banking and finance industry?”

- Suzy Salib

Then, Rampell gets “informed” by a number of commenters. One of my favorite was AnnS. AnnS just nails the issue down regarding the public safety net and the latest Bureau of Labor and Statistics unemployment figures. Her math is pure enlightenment. And then there is further schooling by Jonathan M. Felman regarding matrix organizations and R & D cores and what the long term loss would be to the country and the irresponsible thinking in regards to giving both to foreign manufacturers.

And then there is Robert.

I could go on…23,26,31,74… I could make Oxdown posts all day long just from Rampell’s thoughtful and insightful commentors. Hmmm…there’s a thought.