We all have "to-do lists," but rarely is the very foundation of an entire, 230-year-old governmental system at stake when we jot down the do this and get that of day-to-day living.
Sorry Obama, but you have much more riding on your "to-do list" than picking up the cleaning, getting pet food and finally washing windows.
We live in a country where the legal system and government are based on precedent, and the last seven-plus years have seen a number of bad precedents set. If we go another 4 years without those changes challenged, it is likely that we will never get rid of them.
So, Mr. President-Elect, here is a to-do list that you might…really, you must…take on as soon as you settle into that chair…behind that desk…in that office:
1. End Torture: Okay, you’ve promised to shut down Gitmo. But that was sorta in the cards, so no props for that. How about re-defining torture along the lines of the Geneva Convention? Issue an Exec Order…or prod Congress to pass a law that includes waterboarding, extreme stress positions…all of it…as torture. Stop the semantic games about "enhanced interrogation," which Naomi Wolf points out in my film–The Warning–is what the Nazis called torture. Shut down all secret prisons, too. And how about a commission to investigate the claims by those who were "rendered" to other countries and those who we, often using private contractors, tortured. They deserve justice.
2. Recind Executive Orders: Team Bush was like a drunken sailor with a fist-full of dollars in a strange port when it came to using Exec Orders and signing statements. Stop the insanity. Stop the abrogation of Constitutional precepts, like Separation of Powers. They did a bunch of Continuity of Government planning, ramping up the establishment of a shadow government that can take over in the case of an emergency. Rep. Peter DeFazio-D of Oregon tried and tried to get the White House to let the Congress know what they were doing. Let Congress know. Let the people know. There were orders on all sorts of things, but this order seems to state that the president can declare national emergency–economic, natural disaster, terrorist attack, etc.–and gather all of the powers of the federal government into the office of the president. In other words…make the President the supreme dictator and pull the plug on Congress. I suggest you rescind that. Immediately.
3. Publicly Renounce the Unitary Executive: It only took John Yoo, then at the Justice Dept., two weeks after 9/11 to issue a memo that asserted the supreme will of the president in the time of war. It’s a “secret power” that Yoo "found" in the Constitution which allowed the Commander-in-Chief to ignore Congress, ignore legislation and the laws of the land, and green-light the prosecution any "war" however he see fits. Just issue a statement saying that "the Unitary Executive" is wrong, un-Constitutional and no longer operative in American governance. Re-assert the Separation of Powers. Just to get it on the record. Don’t be bashful about looking into the emails and documents that Team Bush doesn’t destroy or hide…find out what other interesting powers they have created and used…and abused.
4. End the "War on Terror": Language matters. We’ve seen it with "rendition" and "enhanced interrogation." But it’s the “Global War on Terror" that is the linguistic foundation of all the illegality and abuse we’ve seen over the last seven-plus years. First, they didn’t call it “terrorism” for a reason…they called it "terror." So open-ended. So amorphous. You cannot make a war on "terror." Are we going to fight the makers of the Saw film series? A war on those who stage frightening practical jokes? On those who want to stage a revival of Starlight Express? No. We are not. We are not fighting terror. Terror-ism…is a tactic. It has always been with us. Probably always will. Wherever a lesser force fights a greater force, you find terrorism. How about un-declaring the war in terror and using precise language: the War in Afghanistan (which you seem so hot and bothered to escalate); the War on Al Qaeda (most everyone will support that); the Iraqi Civil War (which, you should admit, we illegally unleashed but have taken sides and hope it continues to fade). The "global" war on terror must end. We are not making progress or friends fighting fear everywhere it can be found around the globe.
5. Renounce the doctrine of Pre-emptive War: Phillip Zelikow, before he man-handled the 9/11 Commission and wrote the report despite the protestations of the Commissioners, came up with this swell idea of declaring war before a war was declared. See the Unitary Executive…handy to have both of these things going if you want to take over everything. Let’s get you to write a new doctrine that re-establishes our tradition of not attacking those who don’t attack us first. It’s a better idea. Safer. Makes more friends, and less enemies. If you get some intel that Canada is about to invade, and you can see them massing on the border? Let them take a step over the line…then roll out the shock and awe. But this pre-emptive stuff just makes everyone who disagrees with us a target. Stop it.
6. Restore the Pentagon and end the use of private armies: Donny Rumsfeld and Dickie C had this great idea back in the early 90s. It became the Revolution in Military Affairs, the RMA, and it proposed using technology to overwhelm opponents and stripping the Pentagon and the Armed Forces of all duties and responsibilities other than recruiting and training soldiers. Food? No more kitchen patrol or peeling potatoes. Rather, we set up Taco Bells in war zones. Water? Nah, let Halliburton bring that…and the fuel. In fact, we might not even have troops…people who have sworn to defend the Constitution and have some legal limits on their behavior…to do all the soldering. Mercenaries can do some of the work, too. They can do jobs like protecting State Dept officials. Mr. President-Elect, this needs to stop now! Right now. The military was slowly starved and then the knock-out blow came, quite intentionally, when Team Bush opened up a two-war scenario. With so few troops and supplies, there was only the private sector left to fill the gaps. Funny how that worked out in favor of companies like KBR and Blackwater. Funny how interrogations done by CACI left Pentagon and CIA personnel out of the line of fire, and how those private contractors did not have to be held accountable by the same rules as those employed by the federal government. This needs to stop. And no more hiring mercenaries to act as "’police" during disasters like Katrina. Restore the Pentagon, make them do what they are supposed to do and, therefore, we have someone to hold accountable if something goes wrong.
7. Full vetting of the Terror Watch List: One million people on the Terror Watch List. If you do not immediately open this up to scrutiny, allow those who have been, in effect, accused to face their accusers…I think there is little hope for us over the next four years. Nothing is more open to the abuse of political enemies than this. And many people are on there for political reasons. Naomi Wolf? I interviewed her. She is not a terrorist. She’s someone who can write about it, get people’s attention and expose it. How about all those who get harassed at the airport but don’t know why? America cannot have "enemy lists." We cannot. It undermines the basis of this system. It would be a good first step to re-establishing habeas corpus, something people like Jose Padilla needed before they were driven insane in a military prison. Start with reviewing and scrutinizing the one million “enemies” on the list, and let’s get back to a government for the people.
8. Absolute end of domestic surveillance: Uh…I know it was said that you had to change your mind on surveillance and FISA. On telecom immunity. All to “move to the center” for the election. But…come on! This is one time when we will all give you a pass for flip-flopping…if you come back to the light and lead us out of the darkness that necessarily surrounds domestic spying, keeping tabs on people without due process, without probable cause and without real legal oversight. No more wiretapping of activists. Of anyone who dares to say something contrary to presidential edict. This spying stuff is dangerous. It is the engine of totalitarianism…look at the Nazis and the Soviets. We must be free to speak, to move freely in our society without fear of being targeted. We had all those abuses during the civil rights movement, during the Cold War…and we tried to get past it. Now? Thanks to technology, it is ten times worse. Please, flip-flop one more time and end this…before it ends us all.
9. Restore the Rule of Law: This is last because it is the last thing I think you will do. Humor me, though, as I make the case for prosecuting criminals. For torture. For falsifying intelligence. For lying during sworn testimony before Congress. For ignoring subpoenas. For corruption in the Dept of Interior. For destroying the integrity of the Justice Dept. For all of it. Yes, there may be pre-emptive pardons. Bush may give people a pass before you get the key to the White House. But he cannot pardon them all. He can’t. There literally isn’t enough time or ink in pens to sign all those pardons. Do not make the mistake that Bill Clinton did in 1993 when he pulled the plug on the Iraq-gate investigation and let all those Neo-Cons in training off the hook. They will be back. They will. You must stop them. This is not just about keeping ideologues out of future policy-making positions…but it is about the rule of law. It’s about the idea that no man or woman is above the law. If you decide to "just move on," you will cement the feeling we all have that while we pay our speeding tickets, and our taxes, and our credit card bills, those with power and influence simply run rough-shod over the law and use power connections to get a pass. And we are not talking about going 50mph in a 40. We are talking about the destruction of an entire country. About the death and serious injury of thousands of Americans, and tens of thousands…hundreds of thousands…of innocent Iraqis. We are talking about the various crimes on this list. We are talking about the most important principle of the American Constitution. We are talking about the rule of law.
Well, I know you have quite a bit on your plate. And that the economy is looking desperate. But I think you can knock much of this list out in a few days. Just whip out that pen, grab the bully pulpit…and be the President many of us hope you will be.
And I’ll be happy to pick up your cleaning.





51 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
from my may 2007 list (i like your list, especially #9)
Patriot Act repeal
Military Commissions Act repeal
Dept of Homeland Security dismantled
FISA Court Authority restored
VA Healthcare fully funded
Electronic-Voting paper backup required
Congressional War Powers authority restored
Presidential Signing Statements eliminated by statute
Military Forces fully-equipped/trained restored
Elimination of “stop loss” orders
Restoration on NatlGuard deployment rules
Restoration of state Governor’s control of NatlGuard
Restoration of U.S. legal fidelity to Geneva Accords
Restoration of Congressional oversight of Executive Branch
A “True” Balanced Budget
Iraq War brought into Budget
Limiting Presidential ‘Executive Order’ power by statute
(plus, restoring FEMA to it’s former independent status)
Great list! Unfortunately, it is looking like Obama is going for “continuity” with the “government” we’ve had forced upon us.
Yours is an astute list. I think mine is a desperate cry for help! For the bare minimum!!
Repeal DOMA?
what great list! and so great to see you back.
(in case anyone missed joseph’s visit here monday – he was lisa’s guest for FDL Movie Night to discuss his movie “The Warning”).
looks that way to me too. do you think that was his plan all along, or that something else (events, external pressures,…) has pushed him towards the status quo vs the change he campaigned on?
tyvm JP,
of course i wrote that list under the assumption that Hillary would be 44 and need a lot of off-setting via recalibration/repeal of W’s and Dick’s usurpations.
if i were forced to put it all in bumpersticker form/length i’d have to say “restore the rule of law, equality under the law, and transparency”
Print it!! I’ll buy one.
Geez…it is so hard to know, don’t you think? He couldn’t be where he is without soothing the fears of the establishment. I just get sick of hearing: “he had to say that,” or “he had to do that.” That he had to jump through hoops to get elected and that we have to “hope” that he comes through.
Your thoughts?
2 more “little ones” for the ‘wish list’ …
eliminate the ability of hedge fund managers to escape income taxes via the ‘capital gains’ quirk
restrict the income tax deduction for mortgage interest to only ONE house
(i could do this all day, and just might) tyvm for the thread
not a clue. i find obama very hard to get a bead on – especially if i listen to him. watching his actions gives me a very bad feeling about his will to power – for example, one thing that has gone down the memory hole are the reports that obama told the folks raising $ for him not to donate to 527s. that’s the kind of thing i expect from someone who wants to consolidate power to himself, and not to the people.
again though, i really don’t know and that’s been my state from the beginning – when the primaries came to my state it was down to clinton or obama and i left that one blank. didn’t like clinton but didn’t know what to expect from obama.
anyway, i figure if we have a clue what motivates obama we might have a better idea what actions might be more effective in bringing about the change we’d like to see.
the last few years have made me begin to appreciate the power and importance of transparency – and not just in government.
Motivation is always the toughest thing to pin down. At least, before there is a trail of decisions to follow. I dunno, Selise, I have a creepy feeling about this coming four years.
Welcome back!! I love your list. Sort of wraps up the major issues in a nice neat package. Rule of Law! I don’t think the pols understand how hungry we are for justice. It’s what drives me, I know. Ever since the Warren Commission’s obvious attempts to dismiss the JFK assassination by cover-up, no one has really been held accountable for the major crimes committed in/by the DC “village/ers”. Would love to see the rule of law as master in the US. No real healing can take place until then. (Sorry Mr. Ford.)
My read on Obama is that he’s somewhat manipulative; as in, passive-aggressive as well as a control freak. His awful decision to demand the defunding of 527’s was my first indicator of that. It seemed so ill-advised and petty at the time. Will he be able to lead without absolute control? The jury is out. We’ll have to see what he does.
Interesting factoid:
The 2006 election, the Dems take back Congress. The ConvWisdom was that it was a rejection of the war in Iraq. Fair enough. But…the numer one issue, according to exit polling, for voters? Corruption.
Corruption trumped Iraq, when that country was aflame with violence and almost daily reports of US deaths.
People are starving for accountability.
DO NOT DO List:
Do not ever call on a FOX reporter at news conference.
He likes basketball and pizza. I like basketball and pizza. he’s OK by me. But yeah, the jury is out.
found my ‘i want’ list from april 2008 (as if anyone cares what i want but here goes anyway, with a ‘trick’ question at the end.
I want :
the number of dollars spent by the U.S. Federal Government on subsidies/welfare, both social and corporate (especially high-tech weaponry and the militarization of space) to be set on a path of incremental change, resulting 8 years later in significant, some would say “radical” reductions. (-20% at least, correlated to fewer/fairer taxes and a true balanced budget)
fewer Federal laws more fully and fairly applied. (and fewer FedGov programs/departments/employees) with only 3 categories of persons in the Federal Code: 1. Full Citizen 2. pre-Full Citizen 3. non-Citizen
full restoration of “Habeus Corpus”, 4th Amendment protections, ‘due process’, and ‘the rule of law’ (regardless of race, gender, creed, colour, orientation, financial status)
50% reduction in the U.S. Armed Forces stationed outside the U.S. (in 8 years or less)
pre-WWII ‘checks/balances’ of power restored, between the U.S. HoR/Senate, the Judicial Branch, and the Executive Branch.
pre-WWII/NatlSecurityState ‘balance of power’ restored, between the States and the Federal Government.
the integrity of the U.S. borders restored/enforced. (with a fairer/more competent legal-immigration policy, and illegal-assimilation policy)
the elimination of all Federal drug laws and agencies enforcing them.
U.S. FedGov policies/laws to NOT impede research/market solutions to protect/preserve/restore the quality of air/land/water. (and Federal land/water use policies to support, not subvert, those solutions)
U.S. international Trade policies to reflect the need for slower incremental reductions in the gap between foreign workers’ standards-of-living/wages and the American labor force’s.
The “Trick” Question? …
Are such desires “Liberal” or “Conservative” ?
President elect Obama
I applaud the reporter that you slammed today. He asked the obvious and highly relevant question. Given your choices for your leadership team, what would make your supporters (us) believe that anything is likely to change. Your rhetoric is great but does not appear to be supported by your actions, at least so far.
You buckled to political pressure on FISA and amnesty.
You are in the process of walking back your commitment to bring our forces home in 16 months.
You are appointing politicians who do not support your agenda to offices of high power and visibility. Some of them have a very heavy load of anti progressive baggage. They include Gates who is responsible for mismanagement and anti humanitarian trends in the military.
You are responsible for Joe Lieberman being confirmed as chair of the most important committee of the Senate for investigating the Executive branch, even in the face of his overwhelming incompetence and lickspittle performance under the last administration.
To balance all of this, we have only your assurance that you personally will be running the government. While I personally admire your intent, I am beginning to question your judgment. Pray God that my doubts are unfounded, but you must continue to earn trust rather than to take it for granted.
10. reverse all signing statements, once a president signs a law that has passed congress and the senate has no say over what that law is or is not, declare all signing statements null, void, with no weight what so ever
Funny, but that reads like the Ron Paul campaign platform.
I think Left and Right is being replaced by Insider and Outsider.
related fake news
NETWORKS COMPLAIN ABOUT OBAMA NEWS CONFERENCES
In a joint action, the nation’s television networks sent a letter of complaint to the Obama transition team regarding the incessant barrage of news conferences now taking place. The letter conceded that President-elect Obama needed to speak out about the current economic crisis and to announce major appointments. However, they saw no need to have a news conference every time a new White House adviser is appointed.
The letter expressed the hope that there would not be a news conference to announce that Defense Secretary Gates will stay on for another year. Also, the letter noted, since the appointment of Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State has been going on for over two weeks, therewould really be no need to hold a news conference to introduce her to the American public.
Of particular concern is the practice of holding these daily conferences in Chicago rather than in the news capitols of Washington or New York. In a separate statement, NBC news director Roger Isles said that, in these times of belt tightening, the burden of travel to Chicago was overwhelming. Already, he noted, Andrea Mitchell was complaining bitterly about having to fly in coach and stay in cheap hotels.
homer http://www.altara.blogspot.com
I would also like to see obama charge everyone involved in these extraordinary interrogations to be charged with torture.
the president has decared that he will not pardon them, as rachael maddow’s guest tureley made clear, this is getting obama and congress to approve and condone those of those policies and methods;
important stuff right there
yoo must be the first person prosecuted
your wish list has a host of badly worded ideas
regulations are for the purpose of forcing industry to pay their own bills, which they will NOT do without regulations, they can develope all the envirnemtal solutions they need to develope while they follow the regulations that keep my kids and their kids safe
you read well JP, i have tried to explain “my politics” as a ‘curious mixture of Tom Paine and Huey Long’ but people just stared at me blankly. so i updated it, with a little loss of accuracy, to say ‘my politics are pretty much the areas where Ron Paul and Ralph Nader overlap’
Hear, hear!!
The rub mught be that there were key Dems briefed on the “enhanced interrogation” methods…like Jay Rockefeller…and there is a hush-hush policy to keep everyone from being tarred and feathered.
I don’t like it one bit. Justice is justice. The law is the law.
There are a lot of Lee Hamilton Dems who happily cover up GOP sins. Lee was one of the worst, of course, as he almost single-handedly torpedoed Iran-Contra before it led back to Poppy Bush, the October Surprise and drug-running Contras.
Obama does exactly what he wants when he wants to. The FISA Amendments Act, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, the Paulson bailout, Rahm Emanuel as Chief of Staff, Robert Gates at Defense, Hillary Clinton at State, Eric Holder at DOJ, the Geithner-Summers twofer, nobody forced him to do any of these things. In fact, there were lots of arguments not to do them or do them a different way, but Obama made the call and did it his way. That is why he rings so hollow when he says that he can not intervene on certain questions because that has never been an impediment to him in the past.
8. Absolute end of domestic surveillance:
I read recently that the U.S. government sometimes asks our “allies” to spy on U.S. citizens in order to circumvent U.S. restrictions on domestic surveillance!
Fire Robert Gates and get us a law abiding Sec of Defense.
Anyone who thinks Obama will do anything progressive, listen here.
http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/11/26/will-grigg-7/
Mr. Sottile,
As you were recently interviewed by Scott Horton, you should also listen to this interview of his with Will Grigg: One Party State.
Curiously, somebody translated this for Obama as “Change you can believe in” and it seems to have stuck.
Impeach Obama! Just do it now. Who cares if he hasn’t even been sworn into office.
Yes, this is snark. Rolls eyes.
The country has real problems but the people and approaches Obama has chosen so far don’t come close to addressing them or doing what needs or will need to be done. It isn’t about “impeaching” Obama before he takes office. We would all like him to have a successful Presidency. And I understand he hasn’t even been inaugurated yet but it sure looks like, from where I’m sitting, he is doing everything he can to be a one-termer.
Only Traitors torture = treason Period
Is this a conspiracy to big to fail, also?
Lee Hamilton ,to JP @ 26, I hope not the same as 911 Lee Hamilton.
The Supreme Traitor is Queen Nancy , who watched the tapes and probably passed the popcorn. As a war criminal she would also go down. Ever wonder why she would single handily overturn the constitutional requirement to impeach treason?
No Justice=No Peace and I want peace now, damn it !!!!!
terrorist attack in India
simple question for those expressing doubts and concerns in President=Elect Obama..especially to this “but it sure looks like, from where I’m sitting, he is doing everything he can to be a one-termer.”
One year ago from where you, and others were sitting did you believe Obama would be elected President by over 150 EV’s and over 7 million votes?
The Clinton’s did not realize how Obama has his shit together. The GOP smear machine did not realize how Obama has his shit together. McCain inc. did not realize how Obama has his shit together.
A brilliant bi-racial man (he looks black from a distance)will occupy the White House with his brilliant black wife and two black daughters.
If you can’t wrap your head around how this would not be happening if he did not have his shit together?
But hey..keep harping how he needs to get his shit together..
Exactly!! Thanks.
These ‘extraordinary interrogations’ are just press conferences. You can’t charge those ‘journalists’ with torture just yet. Wait until they get snarky!
heh
Amen!
Now it’s about time that we so called progressives get out shit together too. We’re beginning to look like a bunch of radicals in the Republican party that William Buckley called kooks. It is NOT becoming.
I agree with you, JP, and (to a large degree) with muleboy303. However, with regard to prosecuting & indicting (war) criminals. For torture, ~ IMHO, the U.S. Constitution REQUIRES IT. And that is where your #9 point sort of obviates #1 (the part of #1 where a ‘commission’ should investigate (war) crimes & criminals). According to Jonathan Turley (Constitutional Law professor @ George Washington University) a commission merely finds facts and writes a report regarding those facts and ……..????? Professor Turley even said, “like the ‘9/11 Commission’ did”!! And THAT report actually contained very few facts and major ommissions – such as WTC bldg #7. The professor was on Tuesday’s ( the 25th ) ‘Countdown w/ Keith Olbermann’. In lieu of a commission, an actual D.of J. criminal investigation should take place & “let the chips fall where they may”. Is there really any doubt that Cheney/Bush are torturing, Constitution shredding, lawless, murderous, lying, greedy war-mongers and actual criminals? And, is it true that “NO ONE is above the law”?? (the U.S.Constitution, the Geneva Convention & international law)?
Re: my previous comment = It was actually “The Rachel Maddow show” – of Tuesday the 25th – where we saw Jonathan Turley & a ‘commission vs criminal investigation’. SORRY
How can we/I “hold Mr. Obama’s feet to the fire” on these & the excellent 9 points that JP listed?
I like him too. He reminds me of my son. I’m praying he’s as smart and pragmatic as I think he is and that he remembers where he came from (actually that’s Studs Terkel’s wish but I’ll go along with it.)
holy shit he isn’t even president yet and these 9 points you put up are demanding. If you cut the president elect a little slack these things will get done. But for right now he has some major financial considerations and a good deal of organisation of staff and hired help to look at and, and why would he personaly try to correct the crimes in the former administration..If it is going to get done go after Nancy to get this back on the table NOW, A little Preemptive Impeachment woulld go a long way..
damn good question
perhaps something like http://onthedean.blogspot.com/
Great list, muleboy303. Do keep adding to it, then put it into a petition to send to Obama and I’ll sure sign on!
Thank you Audrey. I fully agree. Why does no one in DC understand (or admit) that the biggest boost in confidence from the people would be the full restoration of our Constitution, Bill of Rights and The Rule of Law??
Conversely, the biggest block to the peoples’ confidence in government is the clear knowledge that we cannot expect true justice as things stand now.
I was a child in the Great Depression and have known hunger, cold, want, need. I can survive them again. To me freedom is like air to breathe; that air is thick with the pollution of corruption.
Thank you, aquarius74 and well said. I think if we could make them understand that our Constitution, Bill of Rights and The Rule of Law is what most of us and the rest of the world love about this country; that defending those things is high on our list of priorities; that it would do a lot for their approval ratings to defend it themselves; then our nation would be on the right track and we would not be carrying around so much anger.
Thamks, Audrey. I’ve signed petitions, participated in questionaires, etc., always giving this subject as my first concern. I don’t recall seeing Obama adress this subject after he caved on FISA. Why is he so silent about this elephant in the room?
*sigh* I know. If you wanted to take a stand that was “centrist”, this is the perfect issue. It’s non-partisan, neither right nor left and one of the reasons so many of our commenters are cross-spectrum. Obama wants to unite us. This is the issue that would do it. Unfortunately, he’s been informed that we’re fringe/liberals by the MSM and insiders and that he can’t listen to us. Drives me crazy. But, there it is.
Audrey, what puzzles me is his background is constitutional law yet he is silent on this subject. He should be more outraged than the rest of us. I guess we can hope that he is waiting until he is pres to take action. If not, I plan to send him e-mails and paper letters until he at least knows there’s one old lady who won’t give up.
This whole question is ridiculous! Only a warped, twisted Bush dynasty, illegal president would have destroyed the very pillars of our country’s foundation.