The last of the American auto industry was forced to grovel before the last-of-the-Bush-era Congress today to explain why Congress should loan the heart of America’s manufacturing base enough money to survive while the banking system is frozen and the economy is tanking. To state the question is to show how irresponsible this Congress and the Administration are (more from Jane and Marcy). So I have a modest proposal for fixing this.
Let’s accept the standards Congress and the Administration are imposing on Detroit and apply them equally to Congress and the Executive Branch.
Congress is pretending to embrace the principle that those who lead large organizations should be held accountable for the catastophic consequences they produce. Executives and oversight boards should either be replaced or be forced to take massive cuts in compensation, even down to $1 per year. And compensation incentives should be restructured to encourage long-run viability in the public interest, rather than short-term gains.
Labor, of course, should be humbled and forced to give up jobs, wages, collective bargaining, absord large increases in health care costs, forego retirement assurances and so on. After all, America’s workers must be responsible for the state of our economy, because they failed to share in its gains.
So what would that mean if we applied these principles to Congress and the Executive Branch? After all, their collective incompetence, corrupt oversight and abysmal management have enriched the financial sector but left it incapable of lending money to an economy and auto industry desperate for credit. In fact, our government’s "business model" has failed in about every way possible.
Here’s a list of things we should do to restructure the compensation/incentive packages for Congress and senior Executive officials:
1. Reduce everyone’s pay to $1 per year until the recession is officially over.
2. Increase the deductible/co-payment requirements on their health plans to 100% and only decrease it in steps as more and more uninsured Americans are provided with full health coverage equivalent to that Congress now receives.
3. Suspend all government contributions to and payments from retirement funds for all current and ex-Congresscritters and senior Executive Branch officials. Restore them only on the passage of comprehensive retirement reform, beginning with broader funding of, and greater benefits from Social Security. Seek repayments from anyone named Bush and all those who supported his privatization of SS.
4. Replace all government provided limos and other transportation perks with bicycles, and do not provide auto transportation for officials until Congress has passed and the President signed a comprehensive energy and global climate change bill.
5. Enact a statute prohibiting any senior government official from being susequently hired in any private sector position unless and until the nation’s unemployment rate returns to 5 percent or less.
It’s just a start, and more will be needed, but as someone recently advised me, the principle destroying Western civilization is the notion that elites should be exempt from the rules they apply to everyone else.





23 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
i like it!
I don’t think most Americans have an inkling of how bad the economy is. They think it is bad but it is in fact orders of magnitude worse.
And in this the elites are really acting no different. There is a veritable orchestra of Neros fiddling as the country burns. The current Administration is consumed by its last minute looting of the place. Republicans in Congress continue to spout the same no-nothig bilge that contributed so mightily to the current disaster. The Democrats? Well, they’re holding hearings and Harry Reid is scratching himself. Obama? He has signaled that he will pursue traditional remedies at moderate levels just sufficient to not have much of an effect. The media? Clueless, worthless idiots as usual.
I like the $1 a year plan although if we were paying the Congress according to its effectiveness, $1 would seem generous.
By the time this proposal gets enacted, the $1 won’t be worth much.
And think your assessment is about right. It’s really stunning to watch the government do nothing while the entire structure is collapsing.
why not .. we had indiustrial titans and men of means who served in our government in WWII .. during hard times for $1 a year .. i like it fine ..
and we need to take the congressional and the senatorial and the civil service pensions and dump them into Social Security as well .. everyone can share and share alike .. no preferential treatment .. what’s good enough for the citizens is good enough for the pols .. imo .. they’re just citizens too ..
you want to se SS get fixed .. put it all in one pile ..
Sciff gets cut off from CNN mid-sentence for too much truth telling
http://www.goldstockbull.com/p…..s-cut-off/
I know my opinion on an ultimate solution for this issue differs from most here, but perhaps the best course of action at this point would be for Congress to enact legislation to provide interim public bridge loans to the big 3 to tide them over to the end of February, giving time for Team Obama to come up with and push through a solution that actually makes sense. The president-elect is said to be quietly working to come up with his own plan.. I think we should let him.
scarecrow I really miss your mourning daily analysis and this post reminds me how much
Thank you. I am so tired of hearing about peoples’ prejudice against the car makers and manufacturing in general.
LOVED your post
Keep it up.
I heard something very similar today; it was framed as yes, we may have only one pres. at a time. But right now we do not have that one.
What about wall street. Why is it such a big fucking deal that detroit needs a little help. Even after the bailout when it was discovered AIG was spending millions on lavish parties no one batted an eyelash. Millions of jobs are going to be lost. I guess American will be the newest third world county.
the problem is that the nature of the problem is different (not that the ridiculous bailout we gave to Wallstreet was the right medicine for that crowd is different). Making the same mistake twice as a solution to two completely different problems won’t help anybody. Wall Street was about stupid, irresponsible bets that could bring conceivably bring cause the entire US financial intermediation system to go into a bloody trainwreck. GM et al are about stupid, irresponsible managers that’ve failed to run their manufacturing companies in a way that’ll deliver products that people want to the right markets, in the right quantities. Different problems, different solutions.
Jkat @4 — Federal civil servants* have been paying into both Social Security and Medicare since the late 1980s. A portion of our pay also goes to our FERS pension fund, and we can contribute to the Federal equivalent of the 401(k), the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), which I do.
When I retire, the major part of the money I receive will be coming from the TSP — I cannot apply for Social Security until I am 67 (and hope to wait until I’m 70). Currently, my pension payments are about $13 a pay period which the Feds match, so the generous amount of $676 goes into my pension each year. In comparison, Social Security gets $89 dollars from me every pay period, and Medicare gets $21.
Please remember, Federal employees are not getting “a free ride.” We pay taxes just like everyone else.
*I’m not sure if this is true of members of Congress.
Sometimes we have no president at all.
Examples include Woodrow Wilson during his recovery from his CVA (stroke), FDR in the last months of his life.
Now we have a new example to add: Bush, fils. He has definitely been AWOL since October, to what extent he’s been AWOL between January 20, 2001 and October 2008 is yet to be determined.
Brilliant.
It’s also about keeping jobs in a deflating economy.
BTW near oil futures are currently trading at $41.75. In my opinion anything below $45 is deflationary. Producers have an incentive to pump as much oil as possible in a falling market to increase their revenues as much as possible. But this only works if production costs are less than sale price. But if production costs exceed sale prices, then producers will leave it in the ground and supply will contract.
To add — retired feds hired before 1984 who stayed with the old civil service system are effectively ineligible for Social Security. This is even though they contributed enough, from non-federal employment, to qualify.
Thanks to a congressional ploy with next to no legislative record, the maximum they may receive (if they retire after 1984 – this gets complicated) is the amount of their federal pensions. If they claim Social Security as well, their federal pensions will be reduced by the amount of it.
Insult to injury, such retired feds must STILL pay into Social Security for post-retirement employment, whether by self or others.
BTW, this sneaky business hits women particularly hard. Because of raising families they are less likely to have had 30 or 40 years of federal employment, and more likely to have had some employment covered by Social Security, some by the old civil service pension system.
Fun idea, but there is a real problem in that Reps and Senators are supposed to spend at least some of their time in the home states. This means keeping two residences, and flying back a lot. It is a net positive to my mind to have them where the constituents can find them and bend their ears. Whlle there are many millionaires in both Houses, not all of the members are that wealthy. It would be an unfair burden for the constituents of the members that can not afford to go back and forth all the time to bare.
That said, if we could subsidize their travel (coach of course) then it might work. It would still be cheaper than the 140K per Rep per year we are paying.
Another issue is that it would have to pass Congress (very hard to do)and it might not be able to be enacted right away. The 27th Amendment talks about raises not being in effect until the Congress after the one they are voted for in, but it says nothing about reductions. In any case you would get a court case and have to get it to the Supreme Court before it would take effect.
The major problem is that the Constitution leaves the appropreate pay rates for Senators and Reps to them. It seems very unlikely they would do what you propose, and our tool for making our displeasure known for their failure is two years from now.
Keep thinking though, this has some merit!
Yes — that was one of the reasons I switched to FERS. I had some quarters of coverage under Social Security when I started working for the government. When I found out that switching to FERS from CSRS would mean that I could collect Social Security benefits without that penalty, it made the decision an easy one.
And I agree that the Government Pension Offset that CSRS employees are subject to is very unfair to women.
I actually think this is a colossally bad idea (even as an obvious joke… it is a joke, right?).
For one thing, it would once and for all stamp out any pretense that our legislators can come from something other than the Ruling Class. After all, how many people could take a job that requires them to live across the country from their families, in an exhorbitant real estate market, for 1 dollar a year? Many Congresspeople already sleep in their offices or share houses in DC.
Things are bad enough now, when you can make ten times more through hiring your spouse out as a ‘lobbyist’; what would the system look like if everyone had to do that to make any money at all?
Nobody is forcing the CEOs of these companies to take their token salaries, and I can’t bring myself to feel sorry for them either. Let’s try to remember how much they’ve already earned running their companies into the ground and setting them on fire:
“NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Struggling Ford Motor Co., which posted a record $12.7 billion net loss in 2006, gave its new CEO Alan Mulally $28 million for four months on the job, according to the company’s proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission Thursday.”
CNN Money
How about GM’s Wagoner?
“DETROIT (Reuters) – General Motors Corp (GM.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) Chief Executive Rick Wagoner’s salary and other compensation rose 64 percent in 2007 to about $15.7 million, mainly due to option grants, according to a proxy filed on Friday.”
How about Nardelli at Chrysler? This guy takes the cake; the LAST company he ran into the ground has made him richer than anyone here can even dream, so what does he need a salary for?
“• His tenure at Home Depot was equal parts stormy and lucrative. While his annual compensation went as high as $38 million, the company’s stock price languished and operations suffered. At a shareholder meeting in May, 2006, the board failed to show up, and Nardelli presided over a disastrous half-hour meeting during which he cut off frustrated questioners’ microphones after one minute. On Jan. 2, 2007, he reached a deal to step down. When his resignation was announced, according to Business Week, some employees text-messaged each other with happy faces and exclamation points; others jubilantly high-fived. But it was Nardelli who got the last laugh, negotiating a severance package worth $210 million.”
Time.com
Yeah. I’m sure they all feel our pain, what with these awful pay cuts. What a noble sacrifice.
Yeesh.
Sounds wonderfully populist, and I know that you aren’t entirely serious, but the consequence of measures like these will be that anyone whose net worth is less than a few million won’t be able to serve in Congress.
Likewise, the reason for the old Olympic ideal of the amateur was so that European aristocrats wouldn’t have to compete with their social inferiors. No pay means only the rich can play.
Looks like I won’t be shopping there any more. Not giving my money to make more millionaires richer.
Great post. I love it. Doesn’t some gov officials get retirements packages for each different position they hold, ie Mayor, Govenor, Rep, Senator, President We should scale that down to 1 retirement package if you served 30 years or more in gov office.
Should US doctors get paid the same wages as Canadian doctors? How about paying IT’s the same wages as in India or maybe pay politicians the same wages that Mexico’s politicians get paid? Maybe we should take this “competitiveness” a step farther?
What, shop at Home Depot? *shrug*
They hated him so much they were willing to pay him that obscene amount of money to leave. He was that bad. And yet, as part of the perpetual elite class of ultra-capitalist, he landed another cushy job ruining a large company fresh out of the Home Depot mess.
There is simply no way for these people to lose.