When TARP czar Neel Kashkari testified last month before Kucinich’s Domestic Policy Subcommittee, in what I can only describe as an example of hell freezing over, Kuchinich and Issa joined forces to expose Kashkari and more generally the entire TARP program as a sham. Favorite line from that hearing was:
kucinich to kashkari: no one questions that you are working hard. our question is who are you working for?
Today at 10 am, Kashkari returns to testify before Barney Frank’s Financial Services committee to defend the TARP from criticisms contained in GAO’s recent oversight report. Frank’s press release described the report’s conclusions:
“The bad news was confirmation by the GAO in its first report about the program that Treasury has no way to measure whether taxpayer funds invested in banks are being used in accordance with the purpose of the law – to increase lending. The much worse news is Treasury’s response that it does not even have the intention of doing so.
“GAO recommended that metrics be developed to apply to how individual institutions are using their share of the 250 billion made available to them. Treasury’s extremely disappointing response is to engage in "further discussions on general metrics for evaluating the overall success of the capital purchase program in addressing the purposes of the EESA."
“By rejecting the GAO’s recommendation that measurement is needed and substituting a vague promise to "evaluate the overall success of the program," Treasury is coming very close to telling the institutions that they will be free to use the funds as they wish.
“Adding this blatant refusal to enforce any lending obligations on individual institutions the continued policy of ignoring the clear intent of the EESA to aid in the reduction of foreclosures put the Treasury perilously close to a breach faith with those who responded to the Bush Administration’s request to establish the program. A public hearing on the issues raised by the GAO report is now essential.”
Maybe we shouldn’t be surprised that this is what happens when a self-described "free market Republican" is put in charge of a $700 billion market intervention. Or that Kashkari was still in business school in 2002 and that before following Paulson to Treasury from Goldman Sachs he appears to have worked in a completely unrelated field. Was there no one with more experience available?
10 am – House Financial Services
Oversight Concerns Regarding Treasury Department Conduct of the Troubled Assets Relief Program
This hearing comes following a report by the Government Accountability Office on the Treasury Department’s implementation of TARP. Chairman Frank has been highly critical of the way the Treasury has handled the Capital Purchase Program, a part of TARP. [see GAO report, "TROUBLED ASSET RELIEF PROGRAM Additional Actions Needed to Better Ensure Integrity, Accountability, and Transparency" - selise]
Witnesses
Panel 1:
- Gene Dodaro, Acting Comptroller General of the United States, U.S. Government Accountability Office
- Neel Kashkari, Interim Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability and Assistant Secretary for International Affairs, U.S. Department of the Treasury
Panel 2:
- Jeb Hensarling (TX-05), Congressional Oversight Panel under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act
- Elizabeth Warren, Leo Gottlieb Professor of Law, Harvard University, and Chair, Congressional Oversight Panel under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act
Live streaming expected at CSPAN (direct real player links: CSPAN, CSPAN-2, CSPAN-3, CSPAN Radio) and the committee website. For later viewing see the CSPAN’S video archive.
See x-post and weekly hearing list for more.





26 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
Thanks, selise. Did Kashkari come off in the first hearing as a kid in completely over his head or was he an arrogant smart-mouth? It will be interesting to see his attitude today, given the evidence he seems to be on a course of completely undermining his stated duties.
Mornin’,
you have mail at your site. now back to reading your post
why is Hensarling a witness ?? he couldn’t testify about lunch. this is one of the idiots trying to make a name for himself amidst the Party ruins – seriously, think Adam Putnam, even dumber.
I understand ‘bones will be thrown’ but jeebus, this is kumbaya gone horribly awry
jim – both
cbl2 – thanks! i don’t know about henarling,l other than he’s on the oversight committtee.
as promised to leen on yesterday’s thread, i’ve set up an open thread at my site for any seriously off topic conversations anyone wants to have.
h/t Frank33: Henry Paulson and Neel Kashkari are Dr. Evil and Mini-Me.
Thanks again, selise. I’ll be watching.
When I watched Kashkari at his first hearing, I thought: “He’s Paulson cloned!”
Oh, how I wish we could hang these 2 (plus others) for abuse of fiduciary trust – - or SOMETHING. They have clearly abused the trust congress placed in their power.
Oh well. . . maybe someday. . .
I opened the DIGG and commented there.
An extra DIGG is tallied when we comment at the DIGG site – - just a reminder.
Scary!
thanks to acquarius74 and all!
CSPAN is now showing that this hearing will be live on CSPAN3 (links in the post above).
oh – frank is letting issa make the opening statement.
pascrell is now making a statement. i don’t think he’s even on the house financial services committee.
i missed about an hour and a half – can anyone give a summary?
Just started watching. Hugh is over at Chrity’s commenting. Has anyone asked if these rich white guys flew in on private planes? Anyone been asked to resign yet? Are they being asked to hand in “restructuring plans” before they get any more money?
I just want equal treatment for all of the rich white fat cats?
Rep Clay …..asking about Gao’s nine recommendations. Are you folks “instituting” the recommendations.
Executive compensation
don’t know. just trying to play catch up myself and having problems with the stream.
btw – please read my comment @4. was not trying to give you a hard time yesterday. hope this works and provides a workable alternative – thanks for your understanding.
totally understand
Rep Miller “are you going to ever tell us who got the money in the AIG derivatives”?
“bailouts, rescue, investments, recovery” plan for Wall Street. Still have not heard the term “restructure”. You know the term we keep hearing for the auto industry.
Anyone being asked to resign?
Michelle Bachman…”unthall the credit freeze” How did this woman get re-elected after she exposed who she is on Hardball?
What is with the folks in Minnesota?
thanks (((leen)))!
Rep Manzuilio “are we going to get the 3 million dollar bonus back”?
Manzuilio to Kashkari “Where are you from? Where are the people on Wall Street from?”
man Manzuilio is pissed…
Wonder if Manzuillio “someone who can feel the hurt” Damn we did hear a demand for a resignation. Damn Manzuillio just told Kashkari “he should step aside”
Kashkari is Paulson’s firewall. Paulson should step aside
for fdl liveblogging, see the following threads:
Blagojevich: Possible Indictment of Senate Candidate 5?
Obama Calls on Blagojevich to Resign
Blagojevich Scandal: Jesse Jackson Jr. Outed as Senate Candidate 5
Selise, fwiw, Phil Gramm considers Hensarling tp be one of his most promising protegees.
Don’t worry; be happy:: CashCarry is looking at it; working hard on that; it’s up to the regulators; if you would indulge me; explains steps (bottlenecks) of paper trail when banks apply for TARP funds; blah,blah,blah…
I think they will give the remainder of the $350Billion to their buddy banks, get nothing in return, ride out end of Bush’s term, return to Goldman Sachs. They may even ask congress for the other $350Billion.
Hooray for Rep Maxine Waters: Don’t you come back here for any more, not a penny, not a thin dime until you help the people stay in their homes. . .
Rep to CashCarry: What planet are you frum???!!
Rep Watt: Who’s running this country, Goldman Sachs or congress????
I liked that Rep who went into the bit about the “stigma” of taking TARP money — mustn’t have that. .(sarcasm) .
Rep: The people are calling this The Great Train Robbery of the Taxpayers
One thing that ran up the flag for me was CashCarry’s statement more than once that “It was always the capitol first”. So, did Paulson intentionally mislead Congress in his initial demand for the $700Billion?
Then it was all about those toxic assets (mortgage backed securities?) Isn’t that a crime?
I think they certainly did mislead Congress and the people of the United States! If it isn’t prosecutable, it surely should be. Everyone is pissed off by this thing, the more they learn, the angrier they get. Especially in light of that two Trillion that we can’t even find out what they did with.
thanks. that tells me a lot – do you have a link i could use?
a few youtubes that others have posted:
Rep. Manzullo Questions Bailout Czar Neil Kashkari
Kashkari Lies Continues …”Being on Back Foot or being on Front Foot” WHAT?
Kashkari Lies Continues … “Putting money in unhealthy banks is not TARP’s goal”