This report represents an update of the employment/unemployment data that the government releases at 8:30aET, unusually on the first Friday of the following month, depending on holidays. The original diary, explaining the data, can be found here.
The December employment data continued the labor market disaster. The headline unemployment rate jumped to 7.2%, from 6.8% the month before and the highest rate since early 1993. Payrolls plunged 524,000, and the prior two months were revised downward, with November now showing a loss of 423,000 jobs and October down 403,000. 2008’s 2.6 million job loss was the largest for any year since World War II.
The most comprehensive rate for labor underutilization, U-6, is defined as total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers, plus total employed part-time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers. It leaped to 13.5% in December, up from 12.6% the month before, and 8.7% a year ago. That compares to the headline unemployment rate at 7.2%, up from 4.9% the year before. The December U-6 is the highest on record. (The Bureau of Labor Statistics started reporting this measure in January 1994, when it was 11.8%, whereas most of the other data go back to 1948. See Table 2.)
Here is a bit of analysis of the major employment indicators by presidential term, updated for the December data.
| Beg | End | High | Date | Low | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eisenhower | 2.9% | 6.6% | 7.5% | 7/58 | 2.5% | 5/53 |
| Kennedy-Johnson | 6.6 | 3.4 | 7.1 | 5/61 | 3.4 | 9/68 |
| Nixon-Ford | 3.4 | 7.5 | 9.0 | 5/75 | 3.4 | 1/69 |
| Carter | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 7/80 | 5.6 | 5/79 |
| Reagan | 7.5 | 5.4 | 10.8* | 12/82 | 5.3 | 11/88 |
| H.W. Bush | 5.4 | 7.3 | 7.8 | 6/92 | 5.0 | 2/89 |
| Clinton | 7.3 | 4.2 | 7.3 | 1/93 | 3.8 | 4/00 |
| W. Bush | 4.2 | 7.3e | 7.3e | 1/09 | 4.2 | 1/01 |
*High for post-WWII period;
e estimated Jan 09
Go here, click the box for unemployment rate seasonally adjusted, click retrieve data, set the date from 1948 on and click the graph box to see a chart.
| Start date of data | 11.8% | 1/94 |
| Low | 6.8 | 10/00 |
| High | 13.5 | 12/08 |
Go here, check the box for U-6 seasonally adjusted, click retrieve data, set the date from 1994 on and click the graph box to see a chart.
| Jobs Added | % change | % change, annual rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eisenhower | 3.5 million | 7.1% | 0.9%/year |
| Kennedy-Johnson | 15.8 | 29.3 | 3.3 |
| Nixon-Ford | 11.3 | 16.2 | 1.9 |
| Carter | 10.3 | 12.8 | 3.1 |
| Reagan | 16.1 | 17.7 | 2.1 |
| H.W. Bush | 2.6 | 2.4 | 0.6 |
| Clinton | 22.7 | 20.7 | 2.4 |
| W. Bush | 2.5e | 1.9e | 0.2e |
e estimated Jan 09
Average Ds 3.5% per year
Average Rs 1.1% per year





21 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
thanx for the post eCAHN, I want to tell everyone what’s going on at my business;
we are down to one salesperson when even in slow times we used to have 4, we have layed off 6 people who have been with us for 15 years and fired those who have only been here a couple of seasons
in store laborers reduced from 3 full time to one part time
we reduced our pay toward health care by half
we reduced days of work from 6 to 3 or 4
we are going to half day for Saturday
office clerk from 6 days to three
no principle takes a salary
we cut our advertising by about 90 percent
leave the heat down to about 63
we have not payed all our suppliers from the season before this much less this past season
and still looking for more to cut just to try to weather this storm to see if Obama’s plan does anything to help
For those who don’t know, you might want to reveal the industry & geographic location (might just say NE).
Yes, the economy is deteriorating quickly. The U-6 measure mentioned in the diary is well above where it peaked in the early 2000s recession.
And the pols are dithering. I hope for your sake and all ours that they get their acts together soon.
I am north east and this firm’s field is construction, both commercial and residential
ps;
spending in this area is down however supply prices have not declined, this is disturbing to me since trillions of dollars evaporated I thought I would see some kind of exchange relief when buying raw materials that I get from other countries sadly, no
Price behavior typically lags the cycle in the real economy. So I suspect that lumber and other prices will come down, it will just take awhile.
I see now and if the birth death model is off Bush will have left the country with higher unemployment than Clinton had when he started.
The Bush legacy project seems a hopeless task.
Carter had a high of 7.8 I wonder if Bush will tie Jimmy?
Carter’s failure’s paved the way for Reagen will Bush’s pave the way for Obama?
The GOP talking heads are going to cry if we start equating Bush with Jimmy.
The GOP will say its less than Hoover but did Hoover also lose 2 wars? Bush is not a one Issue Loser like Hoover Bush is the Omni Loser the man who did nothing Right.
Ironically by trying to be right on the issues:)
There is a chance that Bush might leave with a negative job growth rate?
Only one more month of data for W, so unlikely the unemployment rate will jump to 7.8%, but it’d be a shocker if it happened.
In order to end up with outright declined in employment, the January report would have to show a 2.5 million job loss. Now that’s just about impossible! Even so, his record is piss-poor.
Make that 2.5+ million job loss in January. I think I projected something like 300,000 or more, so that is already included in the 2.5 million estimated gain for the 8 years.
eCAHN, thanks for ’splaining it to us regular folk
the digg is open, btw
It is surely my pleasure. Nice to be back in the harness (a little bit [pun intended]) again.
Dang! Bush was so close to Ultimate Failure! Sure he is the worse President Ever but for a negative Jobs number would have been something to brag about.
LOL. Record is bad enough for the history books anyhow.
I emailed Rachel about W’s round trip with the unemployment rate. We’ll see if she mentions it tonight, but if not, I’ll bet she’ll do so on February 6, when the January numbers will be reported.
Maybe she will do it monday there is a lot of material to squeeze in every show.
Hi eCahn. Thanks for making the numbers more real. Trying to be
optimistic – a new year, a changee in administration, looking for
positive indicators – it’s a challenge when the real world isn’t looking so good.
It’s strange that when another round of layoffs is announced, the response
is often the percentage of that outfit’s total workforce. They overlook
that those unemployed are real individuals with families. Losing a job
can be life-altering, and in this job market, downright depressing.
One of the major reporting problems of the R admins is the ignorance of how “real Merkins” are impacted.
tee hee, I thought this was some economic term I didn’t know so I googled it
*feeling foolish*
Correct me if I’m wrong: W is the only one who ‘going out’ at his high. For each of the others, the high some place before ‘end of term’.