Hold onto your wallets. The bankers are coming bank for more money. They burned through the $350 billion that we gave them in the first round of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and they are worried that even the second $350 billion will not be enough money to keep them solvent. The selective leaks from Treasury tell us that the banks will need far more money to cover their bad debts.
The latest story is that the banks want to sell us their bad assets at above market prices, which was the original plan that Treasury Secretary Paulson proposed, except the banks want to push off their junk on an even bigger scale. In one version, the government would set up a Resolution Trust-type corporation (RTC), like we did with the bankrupt Savings and Loans in the 80s, which would hold all the garbage and then gradually resell it to the private sector to recover a portion of what the government paid.
This is a reasonable course, except there is one big difference between what we did with the S&Ls in the 80s and the leaked plan being floated. The S&Ls were taken over by the government and then resold to the private sector. These were bankrupt institutions that were put out of business. The stockholders were wiped out, which is what is supposed to happen to stock holders when their company goes bankrupt.
But this is not what happens in the plan being discusses. In this plan, the taxpayers just do the banks the great favor of paying above market prices for their junk so that we can relieve them of the burden of their past mistakes. The taxpayers get to eat the losses and the bank executives and their shareholders go on their merry way.
These folks are not market fundamentalist types. The Wall Street view of the world, and apparently the view of at least some people in the Obama administration, is that the government always is there to help a bank or banker in need.
The idea that we would give one more penny to this crew that has wrecked the economy should make taxpayers furious. There is a legitimate public interest in keeping the banks operating; a modern economy needs a well-operating financial system. But, there is zero public interest in rewarding shareholders and overpaid banks executives.
These executives bankrupted their banks and brought the economy down with them. They belong in an unemployment line not collecting multi-million dollar paychecks in their designer office suites.
The obvious answer is to take over the insolvent banks, just as we did with the insolvent S&Ls. The government should form an RTC as we did in the 80s, which would dispose of the assets over time, collecting as much money as possible for the government. The bankrupt banks would be restructured and sold back to the private sector as soon as their books were straightened out. The point of the exercise is not have the government run the banks, the point is to keep the financial system running without giving even more money to the richest people in the country.
This is the only reasonable solution to the mess that the bankers have created. The other solutions are simply efforts to transfer dollars from hardworking taxpayers to overpaid and incompetent bank executives. It is hard to believe that anyone would take it seriously, if not for the enormous political power of the Wall Street gang.
It’s too bad that the Republicans’ anger over giving tax breaks to workers who did not pay income taxes does not extend to giving tax dollars to Wall Street banks who have wrecked our economy. Where are the anti-government conservatives when we need them?





32 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
Thanks for this, Dean.
Aside from the many layers of criminality and its unquestioned immunity with bonus pay.. it’s like watching folks attempt to bailout the Titanic without evaluating how large the hole in the hull may be.
Thanks for opening the digg.
Thanks very much Dr. Baker, looking forward to your FDL chat later this afternoon.
The corporate media will attempt to convince the American public that it’s better for them to be robbed blind by the banks rather than allow the government to nationalize the banks in the interest of the people.
Yes…nationalize. Wipe everyone out. Fire management. Change rules of the road and nationalize.
Oh and then sell them in an ipo after we make the tarp money back and the rules are changed so this can never happen again.
I mean never.
There’s another big diff between the S&L mess and this one: the underlying assets in the former, real real estate, were actually worth something. In the present case, most of the financial “assets” may turn out to be worthless.
The absurdity of this bailout is that the banks are not revealing the contents of their vault? Like when YOU take a loan they want to know every last bit to see if you qualify as a risk. Yet these same banks have hidden their so called “assets” and made up values for them out of whole clothe when the DO reveal them.
We are told that there was some sort of trust or lack thereof which was stalling the lending between banks. Screw that lie. They banks are INSOLVENT and as long as no one shuts them down since they are running some smoke and mirrors they will continue to scam the public.
The banks have gone so greedy that they just couldn’t accept the lucrative biz model of fractional reserve banking, No they wanted to make astronomical profits and leverage the real money they had on deposit 1000 or even 1000 times. Their irresponsibility is 100 times worse that any liar loan customer.
Screw the banks. Not a penny more.
The gov should simply charter new banks under new regs. Strict regs.
Fire all the bank executives. (Reason? Obvious incompetence and greed. Shouldn’t be too difficult to sell that one.) Nationalize the institutions. Open one gigantic black hole down which all the so-called “toxic assets” can be dropped. And finally, sterilize all the former bank executives so their genes can’t be passed on to future generations.
Assets is a interesting word for a derivative. Like an IOU it is not worth the paper it’s written on.
And much of the problem is that these so called assets are completely worthless and the banks are loaded with debts and deals gone south that they are hiding – the ones that were supposed to make them 100 :1.
Fire the bank executives? Hell, no — JAIL them.
And while we’re at it, shouldn’t we fire all the people who were in charge in the govt while this mess was developing? Like Bernanke, Summers, Geithner?
I would say that since the first 350BB produced not ONE SINGLE POSITIVE effect on the banking and credit markets. Not even a hint or a bit of optimism – y’all kow how important psychology is to the market…. then why throw good money after bad. TARP don’t work.
On to the next solution.
Personally, speaking for myselk I think these “leaders”, policy makers economists whatever this crew calls themselves should be held criminally negligent and sent to jail. Mr Greenspan… right through to Mr Tax Dodger put in the head of the IRS… hahaha It’s really laughable. No one would believe this as fiction.
Absolutely. Time to end the criminal reward system for these bankers. They are clearly incompetent, and worse, they are all gamblers tied to recidivist gambling problems.
Why would anyone in their right mind give them money and turn them loose in Vegas?
It is the idea that the following people could come up with, lobbyists, bankers, automakers, porn makers, criminals, or the recipients of the bribes from the former.
our government appears to be incompetent if we want to be kind about it.
Obviously bankers are not stodgy and conservative.
What I reallllly love is the excuse for the large bonuses at AIG, etc:
We have to prevent highly skilled employees from walking out the door.
Where are they going to get a job? Lehman? Bear Stearns? Chrysler?
Yes! Summers was on the MTP today actually defending banks not lending because their balance sheet was shaky. Well duh! They are insolvent. It’s is all a big liquidity trap. They refuse to come clean so the crisis just prolongs itself. And what Summers the dope doesn’t get (or Paulson and Bernanke before him) is that banks wouldn’t lend even if those balance sheets were rock solid. Why lend to the little people who bailed them out when they can buy up each other?
And yes also to Dean Baker, this has always been about dumping their crap on taxpayers and having them pay through the nose for the privilege and avoiding any real penalty for all their disastrous decisions. First it was the TARP but Bernanke offered an even better deal through the Fed. But at some point that stuff at the Fed has to be recycled so why not dump on the government? That was the original plan. And what is so mindboggling stupid about all this is all the Sturm und Drang over the auto bailout and yet here the sums are vastly larger and they just keep coming back over and over. Locusts have nothing on these guys.
Book Salon up at the Mothership with Dean Baker’s Plunder and Blunder hosted by Bruce Bartlett.
Calming down some, I have heard so far Summers defend banks not lending and Geithner praise CDSs. I sort of keep a running tally in my head of what needs to be done: nationalization of banks, regulation of the industry, help for homeowners, reforming bankruptcy and freeing up credit, assessing bad assets and working out a recapitalization plan. On the other side, I keep in mind what the government has done and even while often very lame what effect if any these efforts will have on the meltdown. When I compare the two what I see is an ongoing backdoor non-transparent recapitalization of banks in an extremely inefficient way which addresses few or none of the problems underlying the meltdown.
This isn’t working, folks. Obama is putting all his faith in Summers and Geithner and they are putting all their faith in a clumsy stimulus for the real economy and more of the same for the financials. The math does not compute. I would love to be wrong and have everything work out fine. But I look at the math and despair.
And it was Paulson who was insisting on no accountability in his first draft…the mushroom treatment. Really crazy…but they are still pulling it off.
Not only no, but hell no.
These bastards better not be given one more penny.
Where are the repukes calling for the banks to be allowed to go bankrupt.
Dean’s up at Book Salon.
The “highly skilled” have already been pushed out the door. Most of them carrying all of the officely goods in a bankers box. They are noew flooding the truck driving schools, phlebotomy training, or community colleges across the Country.
I can’t believe that tired old saw of “we must pay crazy money to attract the best & brightest.”
One more nickel, without clear strings (jillions of them) attached is to ensure the largest piece of corporate welfare EVER! Enough with socializing the cost and privatizing the profit.
Seize the banks. Prosecute the officers where applicable (and it seems to be widely applicable). Break the seized mega-banks into smaller, more manageable pieces. Reinstitute Glass-Steagall.
And what Summers the dope doesn’t get (or Paulson and Bernanke before him) is that banks wouldn’t lend even if those balance sheets were rock solid.
It’s a big mistake to assume goodwill in the case of Summers, Paulson, and Bernanke. None of them are on our side.
I’ll go one step further – try, convict and EXECUTE them.
Any sign that Obama will do this before another banking Crisis forces his hand?
Can investors hold the bankers liable in court I don’t think the bankers deserve the bonuses they got after the bailout or the golden parachutes.
Heck even before the bailout their bonuses and golden parachutes I doubt were justified we need to look at their books.
A move on the banks might expose the hedgefunds funny ponzai schemes how will that play out if we look at the books and or nationalize the banks?
Where is the pressure to buy the banks’ worthless assets for above market price coming from? Corporate Media Management stands to gain a bundle if the TARP funds are used to bail out the banks. Who do you think are the majority shareholders in the banking system?
Bill Moyers had a great program on the bailout last Friday.
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/index-flash.html