If you have time to read a very cathartic autopsy article on the Bush regime, please access the following link. It is called "The Bushies Stole Us Blind … So, How’d You Like Your Beer?" By David Michael Green, at AlterNet Jan. 19, 2009.
Along with unleashing an enviably brilliant and scathing wit, Mr. Green asserts that Americans don’t appreciate the true malice of the Bush administration, even now. They dismiss it as having been grossly incompetent. Green contends that is like minimizing "first degree murder to involuntary manslaughter." Bush’s malice was premeditated. Evil. Profoundly and devastatingly evil!
I have distilled this list of favorite insights from Mr. Green’s article:
Instead, this was an American Stalin, seeking to use military power for purposes of overrunning and raping other countries. Instead, this was an American Mugabe, seeking to steal power by any means, in order to plunder the wealth of his own country per the interests of a narrow band of cronies.
The mission of this ideology was in fact to diminish, if not impoverish, the vast bulk of these citizens so that the already massively wealthy among them could become obscenely wealthy.
… the plutocrats behind Reaganism-Bushism saw a filthy aberration to the natural order of master and slave that had long existed in human history. … through a process of class warfare. That meant that labor unions had to go, along with workplace protections, good wages, decent benefits, government protections and a far-too-moderate average CEO-to-lowest-paid-worker salary ratio on the order of 50-to-1, replaced instead by something closer to 500-to-1.
And, where Washington was concerned, that meant that government was to become a vehicle to serve not the 300 million, but rather the 300 families at the top, who already owned the most but craved ever, ever more. It was a cash cow that could provide enormous riches to buccaneers who make the Somali pirates look like Campfire Girls in comparison.
Of course, a movement representing one-half of 1 percent of the American public is never going to win elections as such … First, they had to lie about their agenda. Second, they had to enlist others as unwitting agents in their crime. Third, they had to steal elections.
Then, by pretending to give two shits about religious piety or national security threats, the kleptocratic junta could enlist the shock troops of the Religious Right and enough lazy and selfish voters necessary to seize power through elections …
What drives people to embrace stupidity, aggression, recklessness, destruction and contemptuousness as national policy, especially when they have other choices?
It’s been long said of George W. Bush that he wins elections because he seems like the kind of guy voters would be most comfortable having a beer with. That says a lot — an unfortunate, awful lot — about us fearful Americans. How frightened and insecure do you have to be, after all, to deliberately choose mediocrity for your government –
But something went desperately wrong — beginning in the late 1970s or early 1980s and culminating with this reign of the American Caligula.
David Michael Green is a professor of political science at Hofstra University.





12 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
The Bush Republican Conservative fascists are much worse than described by David Michael Green..they go beyond description. Just what are Republican fascists good for?
check this out, re the caligulistic bushies: and this is from 1991 and is about poppy bush!
Bush simply fulfilled a need.
I am a big fan of David’s. He always has some thoughts worth reading, you can catch all of his work at the Regressive Antidote.
Thank you Libby. How true DMG’s observation about BushCo looking out for the interests of the 300 wealthiest who have plenty and still crave more – over the interests of 300 million Americans.
I’m a big fan of David’s and signed up with Regressive Antidote a few years ago.
When probably the last actual U. S. President, Harry Truman had to let Roosevelts’ little OSS spies become the CIA, he did quote that he regreted creating the agency. Wild Bill, and Sir William are probably turning over in their graves seeing what really wasn’t accomplished by their bretheren during the so-called Eisenhower (Dulles Administration). Just like Churchill urging FDR to just let Pearl Harbor happen so they wouldn’t comprimise the Poles’ ultra contribution, and get us in that war, can you imagine ol’ G. Fords’ CIA spook ‘poppy’ watching Stephenson pass away quitely in Bermuda back in ‘89, then getting ready to blow the lid off the Persian Gulf. The Israeli’s had already beat him to it in ‘86, and he must have been mad! Just like when JFK really ended the cold war in ‘62, how were the new southern machine conservatives going to get their hands on that Federal Reserve money of ours? Oh well, maybe herbert hoover junior could work it out later at Camp David in 2002 or so with that nice Tony Blair boy over Colgate Toothpaste in the morning gargling with our troops blood.
Never realizing that by making him and his friends rich short term his actions long term tanked the economy.
Poor Darth his Hal and KBR stock are down heck show me a stock that Bush/Cheney own thats up this year.
Seeing what those two are invested in during their 8 years would aside from resulting in insider trading charges be a very good laugh.
The rich have a greater share of wealth true but the Dollar buys way less now than it did when Bill was President.
I wonder if the Rich are really better off now after 8 years of Bush
Sure would be funny if they were not.
The best way for the inbred upper class to make sure their kids stay upper class is to prevent any opportunity for upward mobility because Bush and his kind obviously can’t compete in a fair evolutionary contest.
Fourth Divide and conquer rich vs poor. Black vs White all while trying to deny that is exactly what they were doing.
McCain lost in large part because Sarah was not discrete in her appeals to hate.
In an age of the Net its hard to be Reagan and give one speech in the south to raise hate and another for moderates without being reported.
Ah, but but I doubt that buying power was ever the point–you can never hope to spend wealth on the scale that they have amassed it. The point is power. With enough of a monopoly on the necessities of life, you concentrate power to the point where you can establish a hereditary aristocracy.
It was no accident that free enterprise and liberalism arose simultaneously at the end of the 18th century. Capitalism bundled small means into large and gave commoners the economic muscle to break the aristocracy’s monopoly on land and trade. Breaking monopolies enabled liberal democracy which in turn redistributed wealth and grew healthy economies.
Now, after thirty years of ReagoBushanomics, we face reconcentrated, largely hereditary capital, rebuilt monopolies, and, until recently, autocratic, absolute government. We just have to start over.
We have to start over because without competition and upward mobility the inbred ruling class produces Bush as their best to be our leader.
Rome had 12 Caesars after Augustus things went downhill fast. The Bushes were never as good to begin with as Julius or Augustus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O…..he_Caesars