Rachel Maddow had a great segment tonight (March 20) on the history of deregulation, called “Cops and Robber Barons.” As she points out, there were two critical pieces of legislation that set the current economic disaster in motion: one was the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, also known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act, Pub.L. 106-102, 113 Stat. 1338, enacted November 12, 1999, that essentially repealed the Glass-Steagall Act. The second, less well known, was the “Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000,” which is what deregulated Credit Default Swaps, etc. These two acts essentially undid the Legislation passed during the Great Depression to protect us from things like, um, the Great Depression. Both of these were signed by President Clinton!
Rachel described the situation after these bills thusly: Bankers, now free to join up with insurance companies and other financial products companies, were flying in space ships, while the "cops" were only able to pursue them on horseback.
From the Wikipedia article cited above:
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, … is an Act of the United States Congress which repealed part of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, opening up competition among banks, securities companies and insurance companies. The Glass-Steagall Act prohibited a bank from offering investment, commercial banking, and insurance services.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) allowed commercial and investment banks to consolidate. For example, Citibank merged with Travelers Group, an insurance company, and in 1998 formed the conglomerate Citigroup, a corporation combining banking and insurance underwriting services under brands including Smith-Barney, Shearson, Primerica and Travelers Insurance Corporation. This combination, announced in 1993 and finalized in 1994, would have violated the Glass-Steagall Act and the Bank Holding Company Act by combining insurance and securities companies, if not for a temporary waiver process [1]. The law was passed to legalize these mergers on a permanent basis. Historically, the combined industry has been known as the financial services industry.
Rachel used the example of Citibank merging with Travelers to form Citigroup (maybe she reads the Wikipedia, too?), to illustrate the effects of this act.
The less well known Commodity Futures Modernization Act is described by the Wikipedia as follows:
The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 or CFMA (H.R. 5660 and S.3283) is United States federal legislation which repealed the Shad-Johnson jurisdictional accord, which had banned single-stock futures in 1982. The legislation also provided certainty that products offered by banking institutions would not be regulated as futures contracts.
This act was incorporated by reference into H.R. 4577, an omnibus spending bill. It was passed by the 106th United States Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton on December 21, 2000; the legislation thus became law as a part of H.R. 4577 – Public Law 106–554, §1(a)(5).
The act has been cited as a public-policy decision significantly contributing to Enron’s bankruptcy in 2001 and the much broader liquidity crisis of September 2008 that led to the bankruptcy filing of Lehman Brothers and emergency Federal Reserve Bank loans to American International Group[1] and to the creation of the U.S. Emergency Economic Stabilization fund.
Rachel did a masterful job of bringing these two pieces of legislation together. They constituted an important 1-2 punch to the economy. To switch metaphors, as Bill Clinton left the presidency, he left the barn door open. During the next 8 years, with the gleeful assistance of the Bushies, all the horses left the barn. So now, when Obama needs horses, there aren’t any left.
Now this is a curious thing. The current economic meltdown seems to have been set in motion by President Clinton. And President Obama’s team is currently populated with how many Clintonista economists?
This is not change that I can believe in.
Bob in HI





12 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
Bush is going to be saddled with Iraq for the remainder of history and Clinton will be remembered for his deregulation. But Bush will also be recognized for not using the supervisory tools that were at his disposal and for preventing the states from regulating.
DIGG IS OPEN –and recommended.
Thanks, Bob. The last thread restraining the Big Banksters was removed in March 2005 in an agreement between the SEC and the Big 5 banksters, i.e., Goldman Sachs (Paulson CEO), J P Morgan, Lehman Bros., Merrill Lynch, and Bear Stearns. Paulson was the main force and spokesman for the group. This agreement removed restrictions on CDSs, MBSs, derivatives, etc., and allowed the banksters to regulate themselves.
Both Obama(and economic team) and congress keep jawboning about ‘we must have regulations….’ anybody seen anything more than talk on this?
Capitol HillJawbone Hill“And President Obama’s team is currently populated with how many Clintonista economists?” Way too many.
This guy nailed it: “how does economic power influence political decisions in Washington all the things that most Democrats and most Republicans are probably most afraid to explore. I mean…
BILL MOYERS: Why are they afraid?
MIKE DAVIS: Because they’re the beneficiaries of the system. In some cases I think with the President has come to accept that there’s only really one way he can operate. And that’s through, you know, accommodating himself to the forces that exist and cutting compromises he sees as inevitable. The fact that they may talk about bank nationalization, but it’s nothing more than salvaging the banks for the private sector rather than talking about the possibility of public ownership. But there have to be times in history when it’s the necessary, not the possible, that has to come first in public dialogue.”
From here
The Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 was signed by Carter, and helped lead to the decline of Savings and Loans in the 1980’s, as I understand it. I can’t wait to see what Obama does to our financial systems – and I am a Democrat. I’m just not happy with deregulating, enabling Dem Presidents.
Saw that Bill Moyers interview with Mike Davis. Great show. Thanks for referring to it.
Thanks for the comments and additional information– I appreciate it.
In today’s deregulated environment, Galbraith’s blog today at FDL keeps hammering home the point: EXAMINE THE LOAN TAPES! When will they ever learn?
Bob in HI
Bob, this is a splendid synopsis of what I regard as an extremely important topic. And FWIW, one of the best resources that I’ve found is a book called “Other People’s Money” by Prins, a former Wall Streeter. This book is loaded with the kind of data and numbers that Kevin Phillips also serves up in his writing.
“Other People’s Money” explains how changes in banking in the EU created pressures in the US for new kinds of banking mergers. But Wall Street was at the heart of it all, and IMHO Clinton either got punk’d, or waffled to the power of international finance (or both). However, it’s very much worth noting who was driving this trainwreck through the US Senate, and later went to UBS: Texas Sen Phil Gramm, the handmaid of both Enron Futures Trading, as well as UBS Swiss banking secrecy and offshore banking deregulatory changes.
On the first page of her book, Prins points out that:
So just to reiterate: in 3 short years, 1,000 execs made off with $66,000,000,000. So if you divide that total by 1,000, the AVERAGE is $6,600,000 apiece, in a mere 3 years.
Just to contrast, a starting teacher in Washington state makes less than $45,000 a year. So if I’m putting the numbers into my calculator correctly, that’s about 1,466 starting teacher salaries per $6,600,000 asshole executive.
Just to keep brainstorming on this theme, note that for my state of about 5 million people, the entire state budget for two years for jails, prisons, state highways and troopers, state education (K-12 + Higher Ed), the legislature, courts, wildlife, legislative costs, etc. amounts to only HALF of the amount that 1,000 execs pulled out of American companies in a mere three years:
Worker’s pensions were invested in what? Their company’s stock (see also: Enron collapse).
Where did it go? I figure that it must have gone offshore, into tax havens accountable to no one. For a very small portion of the population, who then left both companies and pension funds weakened.
And then along came CDOs in a completely unregulated environment.
And a BushCheney inept SEC.
This is a scam on a criminal scale that I can’t even begin to get my head around.
One thing that I’d love to see at FDL:
Let’s start an Oxdown Diary of State Budgets for 2008-2010, along with the state population for each state.
How many states will it take to total $66,000,000,000?
And how many people will those budgets represent?
This is obscene.
I used to think and say that history would show the Bush Admin to be a bigger scandal than the Teapot scandal; this is apparently going to span several presidents.
Over at FDL, Galbraith had a blog entry calling for ‘examination of the loan tapes’;
Here’s a fuller description of his views.
Thanks for this information. This is more than obscene; it points to a confluence of pathological transactions going back more than a decade. I don’t think we can shovel enough money into this black hole to fill it up. I think maybe the only thing that can be done that won’t bankrupt the world system is to declare a holiday on the most critical class of transactions (Credit Default Swaps?) and possibly just voiding the whole lot. It will just cost too much to unwind them all. I think this is utterly unlike anything in the Great Depression, and in a way, much worse.
A good place to start, as Galbraith suggests, anyway, is to EXAMINE THE LOAN TAPES!
Bob in HI
Hey bobs, my math was funky yesterday — one too many zeros in the wrong place, I think.
$6,600,000 per ‘exec’ in 3 years translates to about 146 starting teacher salaries, not 1466. Bleh.
It’s still obscene.
Sorry to overstate my case by a magnitude of ten in the earlier comment.
I’d still say that I’d prefer 146 more starting teachers to one more overpaid corporate exec. And in terms of ’social goods’, the teacher salaries far outweigh the uber-spendy hotels, spas, private jets, and expensive cars. Although I know a few plane and BMW owners who would probably strongly argue with me.
Still, this whole exec ‘compensation’ bullshit is just obscene.
And then add on a layer of offshore ‘banking’ and Larry Summers and Clinton’s econ advisors — along with Phil Gramm of Texas, Tom Delay, Newtie-Pootie Gingrich, and the rest of the Rove-Abramoff-Asshat crowd have alot to answer for.
Obscene doesn’t scratch the surface.
And FWIW, I don’t begrudge anyone making money.
But at some point, the asymmetries simply are not sustainable.