Written by Lynn Paltrow for RHRealityCheck.org – News, commentary and community for reproductive health and justice.
Personhood USA apparently sees itself as the new, hipper, more effective incarnation of the anti-abortion movement. Personhood USA hopes that by establishing the "pre-born, as legal persons with protection under the law" it will end the "injustice of abortion." Its attempt to do this last November through a "personhood" ballot measure in Colorado’s failed miserably. Nevertheless, Personhood USA, is committed to "working tirelessly to establish personhood in every State."
What supporters of this approach don’t mention is that if the unborn have legal personhood rights, pregnant women won’t. There is really no way around this. As National Advocates for Pregnant Women’s video demonstrates, if successful, this strategy will mean that upon become pregnant, women will lose their civil and human rights.
As Angela Carder learned it is not just life vs. choice – but life vs. life. Angela Carder, 25 weeks pregnant, was critically ill. More than anything, she wanted to live. A court, however, ordered cesarean surgery based on claims of fetal rights. The surgery was performed over her objections as well as those of her physicians and family. Angela Carder died two days later – the cesarean surgery listed as a contributing factor. The fetus was born alive but died within two hours.
Personhood USA doesn’t address how personhood laws will affect women like Ms. Carder and others who have no intention of ending a pregnancy. Perhaps this is why legislators in at least five states have introduced bills that carry their message and several more are working on ballot measures like the one in Colorado.
In fact, North Dakota’s house recently passed a personhood bill that would require the state to interpret all of the state’s laws to apply to "any organism with the genome of homo sapiens" including a fertilized egg. In addition to inviting such facetious Onion-like headlines as "North Dakota House Passes ‘Homo’ Rights Law, this bill creates the basis for policing all pregnant women.
Upon becoming pregnant, women would lose their right to medical privacy, since under North Dakota law doctors are required to report to child welfare authorities whenever they have reasonable cause to suspect that a child (an organism) is abused or neglected. Accordingly, if this bill passes, pregnant women in North Dakota who are obese, have diabetes, or smoke should probably report directly to child welfare authorities – or perhaps some new agency, such as the Department of Organism Protection.
Indeed, a recent horrifying incident in California could become commonplace in North Dakota. A pregnant woman in California experienced a miscarriage at one-month gestation. Her doctor advised her to preserve the embryonic tissue in the freezer until she and her husband decided whether to request genetic testing or to take the remains to a mortuary. When they decided against testing, they called a mortuary. They were asked for a death certificate and were directed to the County Coroner to obtain one. The Coroner instructed them to call the police. When they complied, the police heard the words "human remains" and responded by descending on their home, entering without a warrant, and searching for what they assumed was the evidence of a crime against a person.
While the California case reflects miscommunication, families that experience miscarriages would have to expect such intrusions in states that pass personhood laws. Similarly pregnant women who miss prenatal care appointments, don’t take prenatal vitamins, or drink any amount of alcohol could be deemed abusive under criminal child [organism] abuse and endangerment laws. Personhood laws would also provide the basis for prosecuting women for murder, manslaughter, or negligent homicide if they suffered miscarriages or stillbirths.
In fact states with these laws would look a lot like South Carolina, the only state that has, by judicial fiat, effectively adopted a personhood law. More than 90 pregnant women and new mothers have been arrested there based on fetal personhood claims. Recently, a pregnant woman in South Carolina fell from a 5th floor window. The press reported this incident as a suicide attempt. She survived but suffered a stillbirth as a result of the fall. Last month she was arrested on charges of homicide by child abuse and is still being held without bail.
Personhood USA asserts that "each and every human being must be respected and protected from fertilization until natural death." Their legislation, however, would have the effect of excluding pregnant women from this protection. People committed to a true culture of life need to oppose their legislative proposals, supporting instead ones that include the interests of the women who give that life.





11 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
I believe we should first enact a law withdrawing legal personhood status for corporations.
Then instead of bestowing personhood on embryos and fetuses, we should pass a law declaring them corporations.
Consistent with Roe v Wade, abortion would remain legal until a fetus reaches viability, at which point it will be deemed too big to fail and entitled to a bailout.
No, I am not using drugs. Why do you ask?
lol
Well, PZ Meyers at Pharyngula had a nice photo a coupla years back showing two embryos. The caption was, ‘which embryo has an immortal soul, and which makes delicious chicken mcnuggets?’ Wouldn’t it be something if the Vatican started canonizing martyred embryos and a few chickens got the nod?
Actually, I have to agree with this:
Did I miss something?
I’d love to see the anti-abortion-rights movement successfully rebranded as the “government-mandated compulsory childbirth” movement. That would help restore some of the personhood to the, you know, person.
Well, I can tell you that two years ago, when I had to have a hysterectomy, I breathed a huge sigh of relief since I could not longer be used as a ‘growth and development vessel’ by the government.
All of the above?
ok. we’re talking about the same movement that has, in the name of fighting abortion, effectively blocked US ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (which safeguards right to personhood), opposed controls on human trafficking, and argued directly against rights of personhood (such as the right of foster kids and adopted kids to know their family identities), in direct contravention of more international human rights norms than you can list one one page, much less one post.. now they’re for personhood?? unbelievable.
I suggest the following amendment to the Personhood USA creed:
“each and every human being must be respected and protected from fertilization until natural birth.” … All rights cease upon birth unless you’re rich and white.
Anybody read the new “Dune’ series of books by Frank Herbert’s son, Brian, and a “co-author”?
The dreaded Teilaxu use their females as “tanks” for growing all sorts of stuff; drugs, medicine, body parts and clones. The females brains are destroyed with a drug so they are just……human factories.
That’s what these fetus worshipers always remind me of.so, maybe the wimmin could get corporate “personhood” that way.
I hope the family sues the pants off this group.
Good Books:)