I’ll put on my Hollywood hat just for a minute so I can lead a chorus of righteous laughter at the colossal failure of the persecuted Hollywood conservatives behind An American Carol.
Here’s how it fared over the weekend, when stacked up against Bill Maher’s Religulous:
| Film | Box Office Gross | # Screens | Average |
| American Carol | $3,810,000 | 1,639 | $2,325 |
| Religulous | $3,500,000 | 502 | $6,972 |
What does this tell us?
Both films were in their first week of release, which means that it’s apples to apples. Both had the benefit of their opening week marketing pushes.
Note that Religulous, however, was on less than one third of the screens that American Carol was. Which means that An American Carol should by all rights have done three times the boxoffice of Religulous. But it didn’t — gross box office receipts were largely the same.
The per-screen average of Religulous was three times that of An American Carol. Three times as many people showed up in each theater to see it.
As Atrios notes, there’s no way that the wingnuts can argue that their humor free comedy didn’t get a good push.
Bottom line: Hollywood is in the business of making money. There’s no conspiracy going on against conservatives. When moviegoers have to vote with their dollars, it’s just that nobody wants to see their shit.





35 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
A conservative comedy?
Is that art imitating life?
The question is why was it on 3X the number of screens?
Is it too much to hope that this will be the end of Kelsey Grammer’s career, too?
Conservative comedy? Isn’t that like the epitome of an oxymoron? With emphasis on the moron part?
You know O’Reilly & Co. will go with the barely larger gross, while ignoring the per-screen analysis Jane has provided. Proving, again, that he’s an idiot.
I think that casting Kelsey Grammer a man with as elitist an accent as I have ever heard playing General Patton a southern Army General was the worst casting decision ever.
It’ll be a hit on DVD so the average conservative doesn’t have to expose themselves to the public at a movie theater. The media stars that they worship come into their safe and secure homes by TV and radio.
This makes me very happy.
New McCain Satire: The Impulsively Unreflective Duo in… “McCain Goes Negative!” Hilarious, brilliant: http://tinyurl.com/3f7rlg
Just as conservatives will be the ones pouring the most money into the DVD of Larry Flint’s new porn movie starring Nailin’ Palin. I’ll bet the conservative women in this country are getting a regular pounding these days as their conservative husbands have a new fantasy face to plaster over that of their wive’s.
Jane, a quick question. Yahoo movies shows Religilous as having received 14 media reviews, with an average grade of B. The same site shows Carol as having received no media reviews. Does that mean that they didn’t send copies to the reviewers? If so, one wonders why not.
An American Carol was originally boasting it would be on 2,000 screens.
I’m sure that American Carol winked at me.
Yup, that’s it, American Carol wants me.
I’m in wuuuuuvvvvv!
It was the liberal theater owners that purposely turned people away from seeing it. There were lines around the block, but the liberal, commie, gay marriage loving left wing theater owners wouldn’t god fearing, gun loving, right wing Americans see a film that is arguably one of the greatest films ever made.
Fox News told me that, and I do not question Fox News. They are fair and balanced because they say so.
Don’t know, would have to look more carefully. But if you think you’re going to get hit by the reviewers frequently you don’t make the film available. It wouldn’t shock me if that’s what happened.
Thanks, Jane. I kind of wondered whether that was a likely explanation. I guess they figured they could get folks into some seats in advance of poor reviews. Although you might think that being able to whine about the liberal bias of the MSM might be good for business.
Janeane is using sarcasm ??? isn’t she? Let me put that another way – Is Janeane using sarcasm?
I don’t know if it’s fair to say that a right-wing comedy is an oxymoron – but I’m coming to this notion lately that the right certainly do lack a light sense of humor – theirs has become of late, heavy and bitter. Maybe just a sign of desperation.
However, the true oxymoron is: The God fearing Christian Right seem mean, cynical, blood thirsty, nasty, will kill to win, will drill to death – this planet, wolves, other human beings – in war or through the courts.
Where’s the humor?
Which party do you think of when you hear: tolerance, love, compassion, humility, or even service? And please, let’s not confuse one man’s moving story of having been held hostage in Hanoi, with his “get in my way and I’ll shoot you” bid for the White House – or his I’ll screw the country by picking a runnin mate who gives me a hard on.
My beau and I saw Religulous today, and enjoyed it even more than we expected to. I have not heard of this other film. Kelsey Grammer is a rightie? I’ve been in a cave, apparently!
Of course Kelsey Grammar is a terrible choice for Patton, and that’s a good indicator of the nature of the movie. There aren’t very many conservative actors out there, and obviously this movie is so childishly partisan that one really has to believe in the cause in order to participate in it. It’s like an act of charity more than a creative venture with its own merit, so options were limited.
My husband and I saw Religilous yesterday – fantastic movie. Funny, smart, well-produced – right on the mark. Maher has done his homework and challenges believers who in the end, can’t defend their position with logic and reason. No surprise there. Maher asks questions, follows up, digs deeper. Too bad the corporate media doesn’t do the same. See the movie – you will laugh – a lot – and you will get the point if you are a rational, thinking human.
O.M.G.
You mean like Paul Rubens (and his clothing sale ~~ where everything’s 1/2 off…)? (:>
Apparently, the critics were given a chance to preview it.
http://movies.nytimes.com/2008…..es&em
I’m sure it ruined their weekend plans to have to see “No, the other Farley” in the theaters.
MAJOR sarcasm! I am the “acerbic” goblin, you know.
Hey Jane, good stuff. I read it over at HuffPo, and there’s a typo in the last line there. (Could someone e-mail her to let her know?)
I saw those TV trailers for American Carol and for the life of me I could not decypher WTF they were advertising. It was downright confusing.
379 diggs.
AMC and Cinemark have announced that they are extending An American Carol for another 2 weeks. Guess we have to boycott them.
Hey, they don’t call it free-fail for nothing.
And man, that is some real primo shit they’ve been snorting lately, I kid you not.
Too bad, you can’t have any. It’s so expensive, only the rich can afford it.
so maybe I’m bad at math, but doesn’t 3.8 million beat 3.5 million? And if Maher’s movie got 15 reviews and can’t do better than that, then that’s what’s really pathetic. American Carol isn’t playing at my Cinemark theatre. I’ve heard from friends who have seen it that its pretty damn funny, regardless of your polical persuasion. Michael Moore needs some parodying!
When’s the last time Bill Maher was funny? I guess that’s why they kicked him to HBO… Maybe he’ll have the leader of Iran on his show and yuck it up… ahh… the holocaust… we think its laughable too… Use some shorter rope to hang me with….
Maybe Maher should study religion a little. Being Jewish doesn’t make him an expert. If he has been in a church or temple in the last 20 years he would know there are different thoughts than the world is only 6000 years old. He has such a limited version of God… oh wait… he’s atheist, so why even talk about it…. Self hate… hmmm… perhaps… Hitler was also an atheist… hmmm… scary stuff…
Jane,
You might want to check your facts and conduct more than surface analysis. Such improvements might lead you to different conclusions, maybe.
http://allanerickson.wordpress…..-of-faith/
* “An American Carol” – Weekend box office $3.8 M, 1,639 theatres, viewer grade “B”, released Oct. 3, cost to produce $20M
“Religulous” – Weekend box office $3.5 M, 502 theatres, viewer grade “C”, released Oct. 1, cost to produce information not released
“Fireproof” – Total box offic thus far, $12.5M, 839 theatres, viewer grade “B”, released Sept. 26, cost to produce, $500,000
http://www.boxofficemojo.com
viewer grade “B”
In other words, the “grade” given to the movie by a self-selected sample of people who went to the theater to see it.
I assume that the vast majority of the audience for An American Carol were predisposed to like it, because it was so obviously partisan in the previews and there was no motivated constituency in opposition. But Religulous probably attracted many more viewers who were predisposed to be hostile, like people whose churches had railed against it the week before. Movies touching on religion are always hot. I imagine the “C” reflects a wider cross section of believers and nons.
Never heard of Fireproof.
I’m not sure it’s correct to say that one movie does better than the other just because it has more people watching it per theater. All I see here is that the revenue for each film was about the same, and isn’t that really all that matters?
I have to say, and this comes from someone who is a non-believer, apart from the money-making aspect, I don’t get why Maher made this movie. Is it really necessary to just out and out poke fun at people because they believe in something he doesn’t?
Just as I expect believers to tolerate and accept the fact that I don’t believe, I also tolerate and accept the fact that they do. It’s all part of living in a free country.
I accept the possibility that they are “right” as much as I accept the possibility that they are “wrong.” I have never said that I know “for sure.”
Yep, 2000 screens and a budget of $20 million. The Religulous budget? $2.5 million and 500 screens. Looks like the progressives are better with economics.
(sorry, didn’t mean to double post, just responded to the wrong person originally)
No, this movie was not released for advance screening to the critics. (I religiously — no pun intended — check the Friday NYT movie reviews for the list of what hasn’t been given to the critics in advance…you just KNOW they’ll be stinkers.)
The review linked to by CapnFatBack (#21) above was a Saturday review — i.e., Nathan Lee (who, God love him, gets to review all the shit movies for the Times) saw it in theatres on Friday, along with all the Powerline Cheeto Brigade.
Oops. I meant to write that the critics “weren’t” given a chance. He says so in the review.
And markur . . . really? You’re going to go there? Religion has always seemed to be a point of educated interest for the non-believing Maher (who was born to both Jewish and Catholic parents).