Was a man tortured, experimented on, because he had a brain condition, stemming from a head injury, which resulted in compulsive writing and a preoccupation with religious and moral themes? One has to wonder.
This diary is based on documented evidence, declassified and available from emptywheel here, evidence which suggests the theory that Abu Zubaida, a brain-injured man, a man disabled by a known medical condition, was interrogated, subjected to psychological experimentation, and has been held in detention, deprived of his own writings, quite possibly all due to his brain injury in 1992.
If this is the case, this man has been deprived of his liberty, his life, adequate treatment, and his writings – all due to a disability, something he cannot control.
Here are the facts. Abu Zubaida suffered a head injury in 1992. At that time, according to the legal documents, he lost the ability to speak and write. He had to relearn both. This fact indicates that his brain injury, at a minimum, involved the temporal lobe of the brain – the speech center. Following this injury, and the recovery of speech and writing, Abu Zubaida began to write journals. He has completed 11 volumes (some of which appear to have been "lost" by the US government, which confiscated them) and is working on the 12th volume. He also suffers from seizures and has memory problems. These are common after a head injury. And hypergraphia, the compulsion to write, is a syndrome which affects some individuals with "organic temporal lobe lesions". Persons with hypergraphia also show the following characteristics, when compared to other individuals with epilepsy (seizures):
emotional maladjustment, and the number of CT scan abnormalities were significantly greater
The writings of such individuals:
Not only that, some of the symptoms which seem to plague Abu Zubaida the worst, in his solitary confinement at Guantanamo, are also connected to temporal lobe disfunction. For example:
* disturbance of auditory sensation and perception
* disturbance of selective attention of auditory and visual input
* impaired organization and categorization of verbal material
* disturbance of language comprehension
* impaired long-term memory* altered personality and affective behavior
Since 3 out of 4 physicians who have examined Mr. Zubaida at Guantanamo diagnosed his symptoms as seizures (based on the declassified document already cited), and we can conclude that his brain injuries are consistent with temporal lobe involvement, the onset of his compulsive writing shortly after his brain injury, strongly suggests that he suffers from hypergraphia.
A number of prolific writers may have had temporal lobe epilepsy, including Byron, Dante, Dostoevsky, Moliere, Petrarch, Poe, and Tennyson.
Abu Zubaida is a disabled man. He had a brain injury. He suffers from seizures. He has memory and comprehension problems consistent with a temporal lobe disorder. His preoccupation with morality and religion may well be connected to his disability. As may be his hypergraphia. As well as some of his emotional difficulties. And even his connection to jihad – due to his preoccupation with morality and religion.
On top of his disabilties, this man was tortured. Experimented on. Has been left without adequate medical care, his writings confiscated and used against him, in solitary confinement, with noise and lights which most likely exacerbate his brain condition and may bring on some of his seizures.
One has to wonder if they picked up and tortured the wrong man! A disabled individual. One has to wonder to what extent the US has caused him further injury, further emotional harm and even physical harm. One has to wonder if the deprivation of his writings, something he describes as his "worst torture" is indeed itself a war crime – against a disabled man, who needs to write, who describes his writings as like "my child".
The tragedy of this man’s suffering is beyond belief. Especially when you connect all the dots, which suggest that a man suffering from a severe disability has been tortured, experimented on, and left in solitary confinement, in a room where lighting and noise are excruciating, due to his disability, and where deprivation of his writings is also excruciating, due his disability.
The horror of this is a terrible war crime, sitting right on the doorstep of the bush Badministration, which not only failed to adequately diagnose a man in its custody, but has irreparably damaged the same man due to mistreatment, neglect, and outright barbarism.





20 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
I have cross-posted this over at TPM, with a huge hat tip to emptywheel, who posted the necessary documentation yesterday, which allowed the linkage of all the facts, leading to the hypothesis of hypergraphia.
Not only do I hope this gets publicity, but frankly I hope it gets Abu Zubaida the diagnosis and treatment he needs, together with improved living conditions, access to sufficient writing materials, and the ability to maintain custody of his own writings.
We owe this man a lot of reparations for what he’s been through!
This is overwhelming and just plain evil. Unbelievable that this man appears to have been treated this way—in our name. Wow.
Gitmo MP suffered Traumatic Brain Injury – due to “training exercise”.
It was known right from day one that he was mentally ill. His diaries were written using 3 identities.
***********
” Some people contest Abu Zubaydah’s mental health. Ron Suskind noted in his book, The One Percent Doctrine, that Zubaydah turned out to be mentally ill, keeping a diary “in the voice of three people: Hani 1, Hani 2, and Hani 3″ — a boy, a young man and a middle-aged alter ego. Abu Zubaydah’s diaries spanned ten years and recorded in numbing detail “what he ate, or wore, or trifling things [people] said.” Dan Coleman, then the FBI’s top al-Qaeda analyst, told a senior bureau official, “This guy is insane, certifiable, split personality.” According to Suskind, this judgment was “echoed at the top of CIA and was, of course, briefed to the President and Vice President.” Dan Coleman, the FBI’s senior expert on al Qaeda, echoed many of Suskind’s sentiments in an interview with the Washington Post. Coleman stated Zubaydah was a “safehouse keeper” with mental problems, who “claimed to know more about al-Qaeda and its inner workings than he really did.” Abu Zubaydah’s co-counsel, Joseph Margulies, wrote in an OpEd in the LA Times that:
Partly as a result of injuries he suffered while he was fighting the communists in Afghanistan, partly as a result of how those injuries were exacerbated by the CIA and partly as a result of his extended isolation, Abu Zubaydah’s mental grasp is slipping away. Today, he suffers blinding headaches and has permanent brain damage. He has an excruciating sensitivity to sounds, hearing what others do not. The slightest noise drives him nearly insane. In the last two years alone, he has experienced about 200 seizures. Already, he cannot picture his mother’s face or recall his father’s name. Gradually, his past, like his future, eludes him. “
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Zubaydah
Rather than mentally ill, I’d say he has a physical disability, with emotional problems as a result of that. It’s clearly due to his brain injury. It was not till then that the compulsive writing started. While emotional problems may also enter in, this is due to an underlying brain condition. Even if he writes in 3 voices it’s unlikely a dissociative disorder. Again, since the onset appears to be only after his brain injury. Even the description of how he feels compelled to write down inconsequential facts, to me, suggests his writing is compulsive.
Your information is very helpful! At this point I’m convinced it’s all related to the initial brain injury. And subsequent mistreatment by the US while in their custody.
What a miscarriage of justice!
Here’s another data point for you, excerpted from an article in The New Yorker:
Yes, his brain injury was in 1992, so it fits that his diaries were of the 10 year period between 1992 and 2002. In Canada, we would say that a brain injury survivor was left with a mental illness, or a mental disability. The term mental illness would also cover any type of illness that occurs in the brain; from depression to schizophrenia for example. You and I are saying the same thing, but with our own countries definition. They knew he was not ‘normal’, but they took him and tortured him anyways. How sick is that?
******************
” Coleman also reiterated his skepticism about Zubaydah’s supposed importance, describing him as a “safehouse keeper” with mental problems, who “claimed to know more about al-Qaeda and its inner workings than he really did,” pointing out that his diaries were “full of flowery and philosophical meanderings, and made little mention of terrorism or al-Qaeda,” and explaining how he and others at the FBI had concluded not only that he had severe mental problems — particularly because of the head injury that he had suffered in 1992 — but also that this explained why he was regarded with suspicion by the al-Qaeda leadership. “They all knew he was crazy, and they knew he was always on the damn phone,” Coleman said. “You think they’re going to tell him anything?”
What will happen to Abu Zubaydah now?
The first of these concerns Zubaydah’s current status. He was noticeably missing from the 27 prisoners charged in the Military Commission trial system at Guantánamo (before Barack Obama suspended the trials on his second day in office), but no previous reports have addressed what may happen to him now. The Post reported that some US officials “are pushing to have him charged now with conspiracy,” but that others, including CIA officials, want him sent to Jordan, where he has been accused of involvement with plots to attack a hotel and Christian holy sites. The Post explained that these officials “fear the consequences of taking a man into court who was waterboarded on largely false assumptions, because of the prospect of interrogation methods being revealed in detail and because of the chance of an acquittal that might set a legal precedent.” “
http://www.andyworthington.co……ken-lives/
I think it’s so clear this man is disabled. Thanks for that extra info.
The point of saying he’s disabled is simply to make it very clear that they tortured the wrong man. Some people, as you know, believe that people might feign mental illness or even that they might feign seizures. But it would be so unlikely that the man could feign something like hypergraphia.
By the way, his diaries are still going strong! For someone in detention to still be writing obsessively is unusual! He misses the diaries they confiscated. Like he’s miss a child of his own.
Anyway, whatever the result, the man should be released in my view. Diagnosed, treated, and released.
Where is Zubaydah now? Trials are needed; let’s start with these guys. The information is in black and white ready for a court room. I think that is why Cheney is everywhere defending torture. He knew this report would not be with held back forever. The report was done in November /08 but not released until April 22/09. There are many people named before this section where the torture is officially authorized. Some of the named that promoted torture are the torture apologists who keep popping up in the media. The evidence is in, now where is the will to prosecute?
*****************
“(U) With respect to GTMO’s October 11, 2002 request to use aggressive interrogation techniques, Mr. Haynes said that “there was a sense by the DoD Leadership that this decision was taking too long” and that Secretary Rumsfeld told his senior advisors “I need a recommendation” On November 27, 2002, the Secretary got one. Notwithstanding the serious legal concerns raised by the military services, Mr. Haynes sent a one page memo to the Secretary, recommending that he approve all but three of the eighteen techniques in the GTMO request. Techniques such as stress positions,removal of clothing, use of phobias (such as fear of dogs), and deprivation of light and auditory stimuli were all recommended for approval.
(U) Mr. Haynes’s memo indicated that he had discussed the issue with Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Doug Feith, and General Myers and that he believed they concurred in his recommendation. When asked what he relied on to make his recommendation that the aggressive techniques be approved, the only written legal opinion Mr. Haynes cited was Lieutenant Colonel Beaver’s legal analysis, which senior military lawyers had considered “legally insufficient” and “woefully inadequate,” and which LTC Beaver herself had expected would be supplemented with a review by persons with greater experience than her own.
(U) On December 2,2002, Secretary Rumsfeld signed Mr.Haynes’s recommendation,adding a handwritten note that referred to limits proposed in the memo on the use of stress positions: “I stand for 8-10 hours a day. Why is standing limited to 4 hours?” “
http://armed-services.senate.g…..202009.pdf
Answering my own question, he is still in Guantanamo. This is his lawyer.
***************
” By Brent Mickum
This article was submitted to the CIA prior to publication. Passages redacted by the CIA are marked […]
” Zayn al-Abidin Muhammad Husayn, more commonly known as Abu Zubaydah, is my client. After being extensively tortured by the CIA and imprisoned in various black sites around the world, Zayn may finally be approaching his day in court. I and my co-counsel welcome that day.
But what if we are successful and establish that Zayn is not an enemy combatant? Would any country agree to take our client? The Bush administration’s misrepresentations about Zayn make that virtually impossible unless I am allowed to tell his side of the story. This article is the first step in that reclamation process.
More importantly, the government is conducting a surreptitious but systematic purging of any reference to my client from the charge sheets and factual returns of other prisoners whose cases were being prosecuted.
Abu Zubaydah has been linked to nearly 50 prisoners and former prisoners through media accounts and official Guantanamo Bay documents. Of these, approximately two dozen have either had their charges dropped or have been released from custody, including British resident Binyam Mohamed, who was recently released to British authorities without any charges. Before charges were dropped against Binyam Mohamed, Sufyian Barhoumi, Ghassan al-Sharbi and Jabran Sard al-Qahtani, each had their charge sheets redrafted to remove every reference to Abu Zubaydah.
Internationally, several individuals alleged to have known Abu Zubaydah have had their charges dropped, been released, or received other relief from their handlers. Abousfian Abdelrazik was alleged by the State Department to be closely associated with Abu Zubaydah.
In 2008, Canada asked the United Nations to remove Abousfian Abdelrazik from its terrorism watch-list. Another prisoner, Mohamed Harkat, was supposedly even more closely related to Abu Zubaydah. Mohamed Harkat’s attorney sought access to Abu Zubaydah for testimony relating to Harkat’s trial, but the US refused to respond to his requests.
In Harkat’s Canadian trial, after Michael Hayden admitted that Abu Zubaydah had been waterboarded, Canadian officials deleted all references to Abu Zubaydah’s alleged statements in its public dossier. Mohamed Harkat was later released by Canadian authorities. “
http://www.pro-pakistan.com/20…..on-terror/
You’re obviously paying close attention to all of this.
I hope his lawyer gets this theory of mine. Because all the evidence points to it. And with disability as the underlying problem he has, it really puts all his torture into in an even worse light and makes it, in my view, more likely that they have to provide this man with much, much better care.
He is truly a tortured, suffering man. And it would be very hard to nail someone with a brain disorder in a court of law. Really hard, imvho.
His lawyer has a comment section; I’ll bet he’d like to hear from people who are interested in this case. He knows lots that we don’t know judging by the comment I didn’t include at #11. Even with the CIA censorship, he gets the message out that the government lies..surprise, surprise. Lies about water boarding? I don’t think the truth can be anything but horrifying if what we thought we knew is wrong and the reality is actually much worse. The CIA tortures and then they get to censor? Unbelievable.
*****************
“[…] but the public is prevented from seeing them due to policies of the administration that have nothing do with national security; instead they have everything to do with preventing embarrassment and shielding individuals from potential war crimes charges. Why is our client not allowed to tell his story? The government has admitted to waterboarding him, […]. The government’s description of what that entailed is categorically false, like so many statements about our client. “
http://www.pro-pakistan.com/20…..on-terror/
Thanks for the info.
I admire Mr Mickum and his associates tremendously, but just to precise details about the two Canadians mentioned there: neither of them is out of the woods, as that summary seems to imply.
Abdelrazik is still in limbo in Sudan because the U.S. insists on keeping him on their and the UN watch list, and Canada is moving the goalposts on whether he can fly home, even though that is his Charter right, the UN has said it’s ok, and both the RCMP and CSIS have said he is an innocent man.
Harkat was “released” in the sense that he is under semi-house arrest and wears an electronic tracking device. He is still facing the secret legal processes of the security certificates, and in just the last couple of weeks, our Border Services Agency raided his home and carted off all kinds of things, including his wife’s computer, which has confidential legal material on it. A judge has just slapped the hands of the BSA, but Harkat could still be deported under a highly suspect semi-secret system, in which testimony from Abu Zubaydah has figured.
Fascinating discussion, TheraP, and also a very painful one for those of us who have struggled to understand brain injuries and disorders without a lot of support or understanding from almost anyone else who hasn’t been in the same shoes. Thanks for your work and commitment.
I’m glad to help. And I hope this theory about Abu Zubaida is brought to the attention of his attorney and may be helpful to him.
Thanks for your kind words. And for your presence here does as well! Kudos to you!
TheraP;
I am pleased that you got to examine that chilling, appalling and Kafkaesque link that EW put up.
You knew precisely what to do with it.
Zubaida’s attorney, would, I am most certain, appreciate learning of your theory and I hope we may find a method of putting you in direct contact.
I have been to your site at TPM, several times, and will be a frequent visitor.
The Comments you are attracting there are most reaffirming and the depth of understanding you are encouraging is breathtaking. The discussion regarding Leo Strauss was superb.
DW
Thank you, kindly. I’m not sure I can keep up the kind of work I’ve been doing. I keep thinking it’s the “last” in a series. But we shall see. The plot seems to thicken daily, does it not?
Harper is being Harper; his usual US and AIPAC ass kissing self. He won’t bring Omar home, either. The Canadian government did a fine job of trying to destroy Arar, too. Abdelrazik was tortured in Sudan and Canada’s secret service(CSIS) interrogated him in Sudan. The CSTS is implicated in his arrest in Sudan; that is what Harper is trying to keep hidden. Trying to avoid another $10 million dollar settlement. Mickum said the countries (Canada and Germany)championed their return. Well, the people of Canada certainly stood behind Arar when the truth of what happened to him was revealed and I’m sure that is what he is referring to. He was making the point that there is likely nobody that will welcome Abu Zubaydah and how unjust it is that is that the innocent and tortured man does not have a home to be released to. With Harkat’s case, the judge smacked down the Border bullies. That actually is huge. A line has been drawn and the justice system upheld his rights for a change. May it be the start of a trend.
***************
” A judge has slapped new restrictions on searches of terrorism suspect Mohamed Harkat’s home.
The order comes two days after border agents and police conducted a surprise six-hour search.
Federal Court Justice Simon Noel ruled yesterday that the Canada Border Services Agency must now have court permission before checking whether Harkat is meeting bail conditions. “
http://www.thestar.com/article/634668
The Harper government continues to insist that Mr. Abdelrazik’s presence on the UN list justifies blocking his return and denying him a passport.
“Mr. Abdelrazik is on the list established by the United Nations Security Council as an individual with ties to al-Qaeda. Therefore, he is subject to a travel ban and an asset freeze. Our government is taking its obligations seriously and that is why we are not going” to issue him a travel document to return home, Foreign Minister Lawrence Cannon said in the House of Commons on Monday. “
http://www.theglobeandmail.com…..130360.ece
You’re welcome.