“Why, oh why can’t we have . . . better Democratic strategists?” – DFHs

MSNBC’s Hardball invited two political strategists to explain what they would advise their respective parties on what to do next in the health care reform debate.

In the Republican corner we had Todd Harris, a savvy warrior, who has memorized the Luntz talking points and proceeded to repeat them. All of them. “Government takeover, Canada, delays, rationing, scare, lie, confuse.”

In the Democratic corner we had Steve McMahon, . . . uh, whose advice we can summarize/paraphase as follows:

“There’s 80 percent agreement on what reforms we should undertake, and that’s good enough. Obama once said he’d rather get 80 percent and strong bipartisan support than get 100 percent and no bipartisan support. Therefore, he should take the bipartisan deal in front of him.

“This means he should give up on the remaining contentious issues, such as a public health insurance option, because the Republicans don’t want that, and any tax on health benefits or wealthy peoples’ charitable contributions, because Democrats don’t want that. See how even handed that is?”

So, the consistent political advice to Republicans is to lie, confuse and scare people, hoping to kill any real reform. The political advice from Democratic “experts” is the give up on the key feature that, as the President has said, will “keep the private insurers honest,” and instead accept the “80 percent that’s left.”

And what’s left? Well, we’d have a mandate to force everyone who could afford it to purchase insurance from private insurers, and we’d have government subsidies to help those who couldn’t afford to purchase insurance from private insurers. Consumers would not have a public option, so they’d have no meaningful choice, because the private industry is too highly concentrated to provide meaningful competition.

But real competition can’t be included, because that’s not part of the 80 percent and it just upsets Republicans, nor would there be meaningful regulatory oversight of the private insurers, because that’s not part of the 80 percent either and Republicans won’t like it.

And without the taxes (and other revenues still not agreed to) we wouldn’t have sufficient revenues to pay for the subsidies we would need to make sure the private insurance companies received full premiums from poor people. But Republicans don’t like taxes anyway.

Total it up
:

– Guaranteed markets with no competition or adequate regulation for private insurers,

– No choice for consumers,

– No revenues to pay for the subsidies that go straight to the insurers’ pockets, so we have another "entitlements" crisis.

Result: The “reform” fails, costs tons of money, explodes the deficit, and it’s Obama’s and the Dem’s fault, because . . . most of the Republicans didn’t vote for the "agreement" anyway. What, you didn’t see that coming?

And that, my friends, is exactly how Democrats lose on policy, betray and dismay their supporters and lose the American peoples’ trust.

Update: I’ve added a video of Sen. Jeff Merkley, who notes Mitch McConnell is using Luntz’ talking points. Also, Sen. Tom Coburn uses Luntz talking points verbatum.

Other testimonials:
Great Orange Satan, McMahon is the sweetest, kindest, most lovable . . .
Wonkette, discounts Satanic view by 25 percent