The Obama administration is having a tough time getting its request for $108 billion for the IMF through Congress. Bank bailouts are rapidly losing popularity. And bailouts of foreign banks are probably even less popular than bailouts of U.S. banks.
But, NPR is rushing to the rescue. It had a piece this morning telling listeners that it was important to get the IMF more money to help the poor countries of the world. The piece never mentions the fact that the bulk of the IMF lending at present is going to East European countries, not the developing world.
The basic problem is simple. The West European bankers proved to be every bit as stupid as the Robert Rubin-Citigroup crew in dishing out loans. The main outlet for their bad loans was Eastern Europe, where they made enormous loans denominated in euros.
It is very difficult for the countries of Eastern Europe to maintain their exchange rates against the euro without large amounts of assistance. However, if they let their currencies fall against the euro, then the default rates on the loans from Western European banks will explode.
Of course West Europe is rich enough to bail out its own banks, but the governments in countries like France and Germany know that their people will not stand for this sort of handout. In steps the IMF, with a big assist from NPR, which managed to not even mention East Europe in the piece.
NPR made one major misrepresentation that is worth noting. It referred to a "global savings glut" which it attributes to developing countries’ fears that the IMF won’t have enough resources to bail them out in a crisis, and therefore their need to self-insure. WRONG!!!!!!
Developing countries only began to accumulate massive amounts of foreign exchange (i.e. savings) after the East Asian financial crisis in 1997. There was no talk at the time about the IMF not having enough money. Rather, the explicit motive of most of these countries was to accumulate enough reserves that they would never need to turn to the IMF for a bailout.
The conditions that the IMF imposed on the East Asian countries, who had previously been the superstars of the developing world, were seen as being so onerous that other countries wanted to make sure that they never were forced to turn to the IMF for help. Therefore they deliberately kept their exchange rates under-valued so that they would run huge trade surpluses, which let them rapidly build reserves.
In short, the IMF’s conduct was a major cause of the global imbalances that led to the current economic crisis. NPR turns history on its head in telling listeners that more support for the IMF is the solution.





16 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
a most excellent summary and explanation. thank you.
Every bit of info here seems to be true..however the same arguments can probably be made against domestic ‘big’ bank bailouts. None of these bailouts appear to help the little people, poor and lower middle class and in some cases any middle class. Regulation, global or domestic would help produce an economic system that could work for everyone except criminals and fools.
NPR has become a mouthpiece for Beltway speak. It started going off the rails back in the early 90s when it moved to its then new headquarters and completed its transition from being an upstart operation to a comfortable part of the Establishment.
NPR is currently planning another move in 2012 or thereabouts to a new 400,000 sq. ft. center where it can misreport the news from more palatial surroundings. Surprisingly, NPR closed on the deal last year a mere 2 weeks after the September 15 financial meltdown hit. Apparently, the DC real estate bubble was still perking along because NPR sold the site of its now old new headquarters for $119 million. It had paid $12.8 million for the site in 1992. Even though it expects to net $80 million on the deal, NPR will still look to their coterie of faithful
rubeslisteners to help finance this extravaganza. This should put in context, I hope, the announcement of job cuts at NPR a few months back because of their, ahem, financial difficulties. Still I wonder if the coming crash in commercial real estate will come back to bite them. If it does, it could not happen to more deserving folks.http://washington.bizjournals……ily47.html
thanks, dean and hugh. npr has been such a nasty piece of work in recent years.
NPR: Nice Polite Republicans. (As opposed to the nasty ones like Savage Weiner and Limbaugh.)
Thanks for this, Dean. Avoiding the IMF’s austerity requirements for bailouts was exactly what I remember as the _real_ issue.
And those arguments WERE made domestically. To no avail, and to crickets from the M$M.
FunnyWheelieDiva
Thanks Hugh, Dean, at al., for the exposés and clarifications. NPR used to be very jaunty and scrappy with good investigative news reports, apart from whatever was pulled off the wire, back in the 70s-80s. WETA-FM used to be a fine example of quality radio content. All a thing of the past.
Bank bailouts are rapidly losing popularity.
When were they ever popular? I understand that constituent opinion on the last bail out vote was divided between no and hell no.
WETA FM is once again the home of quality programming, now that they have switched to an all classical format.
IMO that was always the point.
Are the bushista’s still running NPR?
In case this post gets front paged, here’s a graph to emphasize it
http://media.economist.com/ima…..CBB266.gif
From this article
http://www.economist.com/busin…..d=13447231
Yeah, it’s nice to hear Mr. Radio Voice John Chester on the air there since the long-lived commercial classical station, WGMS-FM, got knocked off by one of those nasty media conglomerates.
Right On!!1!
It’s a year old, but Greg Palast interviews Joseph Stiglitz about the World Bank and the IMF
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrynBzUpyag
In response to Hugh
NPR went off the rails when each baby-boomer university had to have their
own NPR station with its individual flair. And it was decided the stations
could be closer than 90 miles from each other, which let Reagan in the door to stop our taxes from paying for it. Now they got us coming and going keeping facist administrations happy while there hands are in both our pockets. I’m sure the lay-offs are like university politics/crypto-nazi.