Edward Yingling of the American Bankers Association roars about the horrors of an agency to protect consumers from his rapacious members.
However, we believe the Administration’s proposal is so vast and controversial that it will be extremely difficult to enact and will produce great uncertainty in the financial markets and among financial regulators while it is pending. It needlessly rips apart all the existing regulatory agencies, eliminates charter choices and creates a new agency with powers to mandate loans and services that go well beyond consumer protection.
He tells the NYT:
“You are talking about an agency that is authorized to design financial products and, in fact, say that they must be offered first, over the banks’ own products,” said Mr. Yingling.
Sure sounds like socialism to me. It also sounds like Richard Whitney, then President of the NYSE, speaking in 1934 to the Wall Street Journal, which provides this link
to an old article.
Pointing out that in many respectss it deals with matters that are already covered by rules of the New York Stock Exchange, Richard Whitney, president of the Exchange, in a statement issued last night on the proposed National Securities Exchange act of 1934, said that the bill contains provisions which would impair the liquidity of American securities, that it would operate particularly against members doing business in small financial centers, that it would destroy the odd-lot business and that it would probably prove so burdensome to many corporations that the latter would be unwilling to keep their securities listed on any exchange.
Richard Whitney turned out to be one of the Bernie Madoffs of his day, and spent over three years at Sing Sing for embezzlement.
Other Wall Streeters read from that old playbook:
"Regulatory reforms will bring about the end of ‘light-touch’ regulation," Philip Finch, an analyst at UBS AG, wrote in a note to clients. "The future will be one of lower average return on equity," a measure of profits.
You’d almost think these guys played no role in the great crash of 1929 2008.
I’m sure they will rest easier knowing that President Obama is really concerned about their problems. He wants to regulate with a light touch, he tells the WSJ:
The right rules, he said, will allow a recovery that isn’t built on speculative bubbles — and that don’t stifle financial marketplace innovations that have helped lots of small guys in recent years.
I hope all of you will provide examples of the way all that lovely financial innovation has helped you. Extra points for the people who were helped by credit default swaps.





23 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
“that have helped lots of small guys in recent years.” ; Oh yeah, Mr. President? Please provide evidence of these ’small guys’ and while you are at it, tell us again how homeowners facing foreclosure are being helped by your policies and programs.
You may look fit but your suit is empty.
He had tried to turn himself in, previously, but they wouldn’t arrest him.
************
” “He’s in FBI [Federal Bureau of Investigation] custody.”
Stanford had been staying with his girlfriend in Fredericksburg, about 80km south of Washington, when FBI agents arrived on Thursday, DeGuerin said.
Stanford walked outside and spoke to the agents, saying that if they had a warrant they should arrest him and that he was going to hand himself in on his return to Houston if they didn’t. “
http://english.aljazeera.net/n…..24306.html
I don’t recall being a beneficiary of the collapse of the most recent financial bubble, anymore than in the previous ones under the loosely regulated regime we have to suffer through time and again while the perps plead ignorance. That falls only to those who, in any event, never pay for anything to get what they want, each of whom would run you over with their Ferrari as soon as look at you.
Let’s be clear, the consumer protection agency proposed in these “regulations” is the lightning rod that will be jettisoned to get a “bipartisan” bill through so Obama can pretend he and the Dems have done anything even remotely useful. It is the same dynamic as with Health Care. Single Payer was immediately taken off the table to push the debate in a direction favorable to the insurance industry. Now, rather than leveraging Single Payer to get a public option (crap, but the best alternative left), he will use the public option to get co-ops. It’s all about the appearance of change (you can make believe in).
Or, if you’re into the whole brevity thing, Obama sucks.
Unbelievable.
It’s like last fall never happened.
Yeah f%#*wad, the “future will be one of lower average return on equity”, because the past’s return on equity was created with very dangerous 35-1 leverage, fraudulent credit ratings, and nonexistent regulation.
We see where that got us.
Balongworth – you got a better president stashed somewhere? Everyone has better ideas, but the trick is to make them reality.
Gee, I guess you don’t get any points. I don’t think I’ll be awarding many.
Ah, the Yingling Circus is in town.
Been working all my life, almost ready to retire,we stashed some money in the stock market. Some nice money manager told us where to put our savings.
I suspect that there were CDSs in our portfolio.
Half of our retirement, gone. Equity in our home, wiped out. Is that what you mean? Does this man have some of my money? How can I contact him?
Danger Will Robinson..Too many rules to protect the innocent. Whitney sounds like the street mugger that complained ” If it wasn’t for all of these police they never would have caught me”.
Yingling is a very important man. I’m sure he will want to take care of you. You can reach him at the American Bankers Association:
Actually, I’m not so sure about that last bit. The e-mail address is for their webmaster.
As one who works in financial services, IMHO the reforms necessary are quite simple.
1) Reign in the hedge funds by dramatically reducing their use of leverage and mandating they report all investment activity to the SEC.
2) Strictly enforce the (already on the books) rule against naked short selling; before you short a stock you must borrow it. Also, bring back the uptick rule.
3) Place all credit derivative swaps on exchanges, and stop the issuance of new contracts as old ones expire until we get down to some manageable size. I don’t know that number, but I do know 60+ Trillion (since they aren’t currently on exchanges,we don’t know how many are out there) ain’t it.
4) Restrict speculation in oil futures contracts to entities that have a legitimate business reason to do so, such as airlines, etc.
Here’s a great headline from the NYT:
And from the article:
The list included some officials of unnamed consumer groups and unnamed academics.
Names:
I have some advice, but no one asked me.
At some point we need to admit that the chosen one was playing us. The old hope a dope. Not as bad as Bush is not good enough.
At last, a paper of record.
that is one of the biggest reasons i doubt any public plan health care reform from this administration will end up being something other than a dumping ground for the very sick (those that the private insurance companies don’t want to cover). does anyone seriously think the regulation to deal with adverse selection and all the rest will be written without the “help” of the insurance industry lobbyists?
happy to be proven wrong, but until i see more than slogans and talking points i am very skeptical. and i also note that what looks like a semi-reasonable public plan bill (even lowers total costs!), hr 193, is apparently off the table along with single payer hr 676.
http://oxdown.firedoglake.com/diary/5749
Your point being what? That I should have shut up during the Bush years too because we can’t randomly swap Presidents?
Seriously, at what point are people going to stop cutting the Obama administration such a ludicrous amount of slack.
His walk has proven to be 180 degrees from his talk. Perhaps it is simply the reality of beltway life that you don’t even get to run for President without compromising yourself somehow. Obama was always a part of the corporatist DCCC/DNC club, so it was to be expected that he would be on a short leash with many of his proposals, particularly with Rahm riding shotgun.
Which, of course, completely explains his massive reversals on transparency and the rule of law except, when it come to the gay community, and his absurdly weak proposed “reforms” for Wall Street.
So, when I say “Obama sucks,” I am referring to his administration, and not him specifically. Although Obama himself has said that responsibility for his administration’s actions stops with him (which is a nice sentiment, anyway).
To recap, this administration has:
-reversed on FISA with telcom immunity (then Obama was just a candidate, but it was a canary/coalmine instance that should have shown where this administration was heading).
-protected Joe Lieberman and let him retain his chairmanships.
-has repeatedly tried to block lawsuits and FOIA requests involving wiretapping and torture.
-severely weakened the stimulus bill by lowering the overall amount and setting aside 45% of the total for ineffectual tax cuts.
-supports the enactment of a law crafted for the sole purpose of avoiding the current rule of law (FISA and photo suppression)
-has blocked any mention, much less support, for true health care reform via single payer.
has actually defended DOMA after pledging to repeal it (along with DADT)
-is still funding both wars and actually expanding one.
-managed to find hundreds of billions for Wall Street firms and European banks, but can’t find the money for automobile and auto parts companies (union busting at it’s best) or California (which, admittedly, is reaping what it has sown).
-has repeatedly and brazenly violated it’s pledge to keep out lobbyists (it’s practically the United States of Citi Bank).
-has kept many of the Bush staffers who were known to be behind many of the war crimes committed over the past 8 years.
Shall I continue?
please do
Getting back to the bankers. I have often wondered what had happened to the mob(mafia also) and the loan sharks. Now I know. They simply discovered that they could do better as bankers pushing loans and credit cards than they did loansharking and extorting money from businesses. They have turned in the Good Fellas image and become button down bankers
This is actually a lot funnier if you remember that UBS was smuggling diamonds in toothpaste tubes in an effort to help its rich clients avoid taxes.
“Transparency” apparently doesn’t mean the same thing to Obama it does to me, or a lot of others, I would imagine.
Keep in mind that this is the same administration that couldn’t be bothered to fight for the cram down provision in the stimulus bill but had no trouble dropping funding for a multitude of programs to make room for tax cuts (http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/07/stimulus.cuts/index.html) and who let credit cards rate caps (i.e. anti-usury measures) get pulled from the recent credit card “rights” bill.
So, yeah, I’m betting this agency never sees the light of day.
UBS was smuggling diamonds in toothpaste tubes in an effort to help its rich clients avoid taxes.
That’s clearly a financial innovation!
Is that some kind of joke: how many diamonds fit in a toothpaste tube? Like how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?