In William Greider’s new book "Come Home America", he makes a main point with which I agree. It’s not just the blue dogs or moderate Democrats who are the problem. It’s that the entire Democratic Party is now also the party of capital along with the regular but unhinged party of capital, the Republicans. The two parties fight over smaller issues but when it comes to shoveling money to corporations and Wall Street, they collude with each other to pass a "bipartisan compromise" that Greider says means "the people are about to be screwed."
Greider is a trained reporter and for years wrote for Rolling Stone. Matt Taibbi is following in his footsteps with great reportage there. They talk to lots of people everywhere and not just the same old D.C. cocktail weenie crowd. Taibbi as well as the economic blogs nailed the "cap and trade" bipartisan compromise for what it is; a big scam that is going to make traders over $10 Trillion and won’t do much for the environment. Top Obama contributor Exelon bragged about making $1 billion a year because of this bill.
Same thing will happen with this so-called health care reform. The sickness industry will make lots more money with those 50 million uninsured back in their clutches and the rest of us having to buy more supplemental insurance to cover the continuing doughnut holes, co-pays and deductibles. As it is many Americans have to give these leaches their homes in exchange for treatment.
The media has fallen down on the job again. So rather than reading the same old same old (and especially columnists at the Washington Post now that Dan Froomkin is gone), read Trudy Lieberman’s piece for the Columbia Journalism Review
Groundhog Day: Why this year’s health care debate sounds like the one in 1993
Lieberman was in the 1993 health care battle and so this is the kind of journalism I like. It has historical perspective and she interviews all kinds of interesting people that we’ve never heard of but should. She says that all we get is reportage on the sausage making of Washington politics, but no reportage of the substance of the issue. I was at a health care town hall last week in Montana. I wanted to talk about substance, but my suggestion that we ask the Senate committees what other countries’ health care plans they were studying was brushed aside. Instead the facilitator was more interested in some sort of elementary school project of writing to Max on a yellow paper cut outs of Montana. He believed that if Max saw all these cutouts it would make some sort of impression. "It will put a face to the issue", said the young man. Oh it put a face on it, all right, a clown face. I bet the Max staffers are still laughing at the idea of some Saul Alinsky wannabe forcing grown men and women to participate in some kindergarten project to impress their Senator. "Oh please, Mr. Baucus, please give us single payer, Love, Dee Dee from Big Fork." (I put a little star where Big Fork is on the map).
Maybe that kind of dog and pony show works for some people. Fine, go for it. But I’m more interested in inflicting the comfortable with discomfort by asking hard questions. Like reporter John Adams asking Max a simple follow up question of "Which single payer people are you meeting with in Montana?" By the way, what was the answer? I thought I knew all the single payer people here and I haven’t heard of a meeting.
The American people have been cheated of many things like a good national health care plan, immigration reform, a living wage, an end to poverty all because we are trapped in an outdated and brutish two party system that works together to screw us and confine us to a neo feudal sharecropper existence.
The way to fight this oppression is by finding our voices again apart from the two parties. We must demand discussion of what rights and services we deserve as citizens of this country. Our discussions must be frank and open and have multiple viewpoints in clubs or, an idea I floated here in my county, a citizens’ brigade. And they should not be "managed" by professional marketers and managers who gather our ideas and present them to the politicos. No more pollsters who tell congress critters to say "reliable and affordable and quality health care is our goal". We must demand that no one speak in these inane cliches and weasel words.
As much as you may feel comfortable with the same columnist or reporter, go outside of that coop and go free range. And do some digging yourself. I discovered from Trudy Lieberman’s piece that I need to look more closely at The Netherlands health care system and not lump "single payer" systems together. I need to find out how many people in my town know what single payer means. What are the people in my town most concerned about with health care reform? Do they think it’s a right or a commodity to be marketed?
We must put people and communities at the front of this discussion rather than endlessly examine the innards of the sausage-making machine. And we have to call the bipartisan compromise what it is; a whole lot of manure. (I got that definition from the New Oxford Dictionary of Weasel Words, Middle Manger Mush, and Cliches ).





15 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
Max is shocked at the negative reaction in Montana to his work on health care. Shocked. Shocked. That’s because he won by 73%. The Republicans put up no opponent, so a Parlimentarian named Kelleher who has run in all parties ran against him. My county is the most consistently Republican county in Montana and had never voted for Max, but it went for him this time. That’s how center right he is.
We need to keep writing about other countries’ health care systems. We need to keep the focus on how the debate should not be about monetary cost, but the cost to our well being. Get this discussion out of the wonkish managerial numbers crunching Finance Committee. We can afford a good single payer system that will start to get the providers back on track of making this country well again.
We are not letting up here. We are hitting Blue Cross Blue Shield next. They control 73% of the market here.
left you a comment in Scarecrow’s am thread.
I hope his constituents let him hear it.
Thanks cb. I didn’t see that article. In an hour I am meeting with the guy who wants to be the new Chair of the Montana Dems. He is a decent guy and a good ex state Senator who went after corporations. But he wrote a puff piece in the Great Falls paper that compared Max Baucus to Nixon going to China. So he’s going to get an earful from me about that one. I hate being a Democrat right now, but I do have a vote at the convention since I am still chair, so I’ll use what clout I have until I turn in my Charlie Brown badge. I just don’t want to play football with Lucy anymore.
Let’s play military commander.
It’s some time in the misty past. You are the commander of an army facing the enemy. They are stretched in a half-mile line across your front.
How do you attack them?
That’s like some questions posed here and on some other progressive blogs. The consensus view is usually to charge against the whole enemy force. Good way to lose.
There’s a better approach — but because it’s never been tried before, it’s largely dismissed. It’s to feign an attack up the middle, but really to mount a flanking attack on the enemy’s line, using a small, potent force to roll up the enemy flank one soldier at a time.
You want to take on and take over the Democratic party? That’s reeally what needs to be done. You don’t win charging against the power center. You pick one Dem House member, take him or her out, and then you’ve got control of the flank. That’s the tactical objective.
Hopefully health care reform will meet the same fate as it did in the early 1990’s. We don’t need to become another Canada and health coverage will never be an entitlement. I can’t find where it says that in the Constitution or anywhere else.
Section 8 – Powers of Congress
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States;
wel·fare
noun
the health, happiness, and fortunes of a person or group.
• statutory procedure or social effort designed to promote the basic physical and material well-being of people in need.
• financial support given for this purpose.
FDR had planned on putting into place a second bill of rights called “The Economic Bill of Rights” if he had lived. The American people had sacrificed much in The Depression and WW II and he articulated what he thought they ALL deserved. http://www.worldpolicy.org/pro…..nbill.html
These rights are the essence of real security because it spells out freedom from fear. And it is the essence of liberty because a poor man is not a free man.
A government of, by and for the people would secure these basic rights. That is if it’s a grown up government.
Many of us have forgotten what FDR stood for and where he was going at the ned of his life. Thanks for reminding us. And for also reminding us how much the Democratic Party has regressed in its ideas about social and economic democracy since his death.
Thank you. I sometimes am discouraged. Well, more than sometimes. And a comment like yours…that holds my hand…keeps me going.
You’re very welcome. I know it’s hard to keep going, but it’s what we do, and it’s needed. FYI my own blog is here.
I like montanamaven. Don’t give up fighting for single payer. Don’t allow corporate shills like Obama pretend that it’s impossible or unAmerican. If America is about a poor man dying because he can’t afford insurance, then you can keep it.
The Constitution explains exactly why it exists:
We all get to decide if the general welfare is served by making health care available to all, or whether it is better to provide health care only to those rich enough to pay for it.
I can see which side you are on.
When Montana was really progressive in 1972, they wrote a new constitution and the preamble is a work of art and admired by many including William Greider.
And it writes into law a clean environment. But hasn’t lived up to that.
We need a constitutional convention that makes it clear that quality health care is more than a right. It is like the air we breathe and the water we drink, a necessity to a good life.
If the Democrats are no longer the party of the people rather than the party of property than we need to reform the People’s Party of the late 1800s who spread the word through their own newspapers and lecture circuits. They never won an election but they changed America and proved that unwashed people of the soil were smarter and stronger than the elites thought. Imagine the unwashed going against the bankers. They did it then. We can do it now.