Left-wing critics have denounced Rupert Murdoch’s excellent news operation and superstar blogger Matt Drudge for featuring a "lying photograph" of Obama apparently ogling Mayara Tavares, 17, a junior G8 delegate from Brazil, but after five or six viewings of the video which supposedly debunks this little scandal, for all I know Obama could have been sneaking a peek or totally oblivious or neither, and "neither" is by far the most interesting alternative.
There was never any photo, lying or not, and this thing began with a frame extracted from a video, so there probably isn’t a hi-rez version anywhere which would definitely track the Presidential eyeball either somewhere or nowhere, and all we will ever have is an ambiguous canvas where the left-wing paints innocence and the right-wing paints over a whole string a legitimate sex-scandals starring Senator Ensign and Governor Sanford, and so on.
While the right-wing was stacking its chips on "ogling" and the left-wing was going all in on "not ogling," Obama’s National Security Advisor General James Logan Jones was explaining an American military operation in progress somewhere in the wild-and-wooly opium empire of Helmand…
"Where are the Afghan troops? Where’s the economic plan? Where is the government?" Jones said.
General Jones was expressing the puzzlement of American commanders in Afghanistan during a telephone interview with the Washington Post from Italy, where he was traveling with President Obama at the same G8 conference where Obama either ogled or didn’t ogle Mayara Tavares, and if the Washington Post reporter had really wanted to uncover a little truth instead of just recording a quote from "a White House official close to the President," he would have asked General Jones about ogling, because Jones is a sharp-eyed bureaucratic courtier s’il en fut, and if anybody knows what Obama was looking at, or not, it would be General James Logan Jones.





1 Comment
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
I posted this diary in five different venues, as usual, and it attracted zero comments the first time around, so I retitled it and reposted it everywhere, and except for my pal Desidero on TPMCafe… no comments anywhere.
This was surprising to me, because after posting two or three reflexive pastiches in a row, I thought…
“Here at last a little idea is concealed….” but not so well concealed, I thought, that nobody would notice it.
But since even the awfully perceptive Mr. Desidero interpreted my diary upside down, I might as well strip away its stlylish presentation, and reveal that it’s just the opposite of yet another indictment of triviality in the news, and intended instead as a ringing endorsement of gossipy scandal-mongering, because Americans can usually figure out scandals big or little, but about Afghanistan none of them has ever had a clue, or ever will, and the Washington Post reporter (Greg Jaffe) who interviewed General Jones is just as stupid about Afghanistan as General Jones himself, and his boss.
“But in this instance you claim that nobody will ever know the truth about Obama’s ogling (or not) in Italy, and then you claim Americans should stick with gossip because at least they can understand a little something about it, instead of shooting off their stupid mouths about a subject where bullshit gets people killed, and lots of people.”
Yes, but…
The unsolvable mystery of Obama’s glance is actually an additional recommendation for gossip, because instead of presenting an entirely closed system to the mind, where a fly on the wall could answer every question (Did Brad do it with Angelina?), in the case of Obama in Italy the darkest secrets of his personality enter into the unsolvable equation, and just as algebra was infinitely enriched when the unsolvability of quintic equations was explicated by Evariste Galois, likewise with Obama his obliviousness to a fine Brazilian heinie right under his nose would tell us more about our monomaniacal (and now successful) candidate for President than any number of fictionalized “autobiographies,” but the irreducible ambiguity of his posture on those ancient steps tells us even more.