As those of you who’ve been around here for a while know, Irak is my home and has been such for a long time. Words such as hatred, and contempt, don’t even begin to describe the visceral loathing that Irakis feel for the American invaders who have turned their homeland into a wasteland. I suspect that  Immanuel Wallerstein has, if anything , understated how things stand in his most recent commentary as it pertains to Irak. He does not however confine his analysis to Irak. In "The Firestorm Ahead" Wallerstein traces the likely collapse of American power throughout the Islamic world. As a firestorm starting with Irak, spreads to Afghanistan, from there to Pakistan, and finally to Palestine.

I’ll confine myself to remarking that when it comes to America’s relations with the Dar-al-Islam Wallerstein has been right far more often than he’s been wrong:

Let us start with Iraq. The United States has signed a Statu s of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with Iraq, which went into effect on July 1. It provided for turning over internal security to the Iraqi government and, in theory, essentially restricting U.S. forces to their bases and to some limited role in training Iraqi troops. Some of the wording of this agreement is ambiguous. Deliberately so, since that was the only way both sides would sign it.

Even the first months of operation show how poorly this agreement is operating. The Iraqi forces have been interpreting it very strictly, formally forbidding both joint patrols and also any unilateral U.S. military actions without prior detailed clearance with the government. It has gotten to the point that Iraqi forces are stopping U.S. forces from passing checkpoints with supplies during daytime hours.

[snip]

The United States thought it was very clever in persuading al-Maliki to postpone this referendum to January 2010. Now it will be held in conjunction with the national elections. In the national elections, everyone will be seeking to obtain votes. No one is going to be campaigning in favor of a "yes" vote on the referendum. Lest this be in any doubt, al-Maliki is submitting a project to the Iraqi parliament that will permit a simple majority of "no" votes to annul the agreement. There will be a majority of "no" votes. There may even be an overwhelming majority of "no" votes. Odierno should be packing his bags now. I’ll bet he still has the illusion that he can avoid the onset of the firestorm. He can’t.

[snip]

The whole Obama program will have gone up in flames. And the Republicans will make hay with it. They will call U.S. defeat in the Middle East "betrayal" and it is obvious now that there is a large group inside the United States very receptive to such a theme.

One either anticipates firestorms and does something useful, or one gets swept up in them.

Read in full: I. Wallerstein, 264, "The Firestorm Ahead"

markfromireland