You think your town hall meeting’s law enforcement presence was authoritarian and heavy-handed?
Check this out: San Diego Sheriff Bill Gore deployed (but did not use) military type sonic crowd-control devices at two town hall meetings, one held by GOP Darrell Issa and the other by Democrat Susan Davis. These devices are the same as those used to control crowds of insurgents in the Iraq war theatre and have been linked to ear and brain injury.
Both town halls took place without incident; however the use of the military device concerned San Diegians. The LRAD [Long-Range Acoustic Device] crowd control is primarily used in Iraq to control insurgents and can cause serious and lasting harm to humans.
According to the manufacture, American Technology Corporation, the LRAD provides “military personnel the capability to transition through the rules of engagement to determine a target’s intent and also provides greater assurance that innocent lives on both sides of the device are not lost due to miscommunication.”
Should Americans be concerned at this apparent escalation of available response at peaceful public meetings called by elected officeholders? Are warfighting tools appropriate to have ready for use on civilians?
“It’s very concerning,” Kevin Keenan, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, said. “ It is fine for the Sheriff’s Department to have new less-than-lethal weapons, but for their interactions with individuals these still-dangerous weapons need to be used only as substitutes for firearms. They can’t be used as just another tool on the tool belt. As we’ve seen with tasers and pepper spray, these types of weapons are being used to subdue people even though they pose the risk of serious physical harm.”
He added, “Even more concerning is having these weapons for public order policing. I can imagine no situation, or am not aware of any situation that’s ever happened in San Diego County or is likely to happen that would justify using these weapons for public order policing to control a crowd.
The main effect of having those weapons at public events is to chill people and chill free speech and free association.”
Are these sonic cannons weapons or not? San Diego Sheriff Bill Gore
indicated that he did not consider LRAD technology to be a non-lethal weapon, such as tasers and pepper spray, then deferred other questions on this topic pending results of a public records request submitted by ECM.
However, Defense Update, a British defense contracting publication, lists LRADs as “non-lethal directed energy weapons. The publication states: “LRAD works like a highly directional, high power megaphone, able to blast sounds (such as crowd-dispersal instructions in Arabic) in a narrow beam and with great clarity at a deafening 150 decibels (50 times the human threshold of pain). LRAD can also create deafening noises which can incapacitate people within 300 meters by “firing” short bursts of intense acoustic energy.”
A media and industrial relations representative, Robert Putnam, of the manufacturer (ATC) says these worries are quite overblown:
Putnam objected to the term “sonic cannon”, responding, “It’s not a sound cannon. It gets their attention and hopefully gets them to comply.”
He also denied that the company’s LRADs can cause hearing problems or other health concerns. “No, not true,” he said. “You’d have to be in close proximity for several minutes in order to have any damage at all. If you willingly stand in that beam for an extended situation, then that’s your choice. There’s no way a large crowd would stay.”
He said the company provides hands-on training to customers and has not had any lawsuits filed over damaged related to LRADs. The company is now offering a hand-held model, he added, which costs about $5,000 and can emit noise levels up to 135 dB. The device can also be adapted to have a high-powered light, infrared night vision, or the ability to translate commands into a foreign language.
Compliance via aural pain: it’s the new free speech zone.
There has been no comment from either Congressman Issa or Congresswoman Davis about the non-lethal sonic weapons capability deployed for possible use on unruly citizens demonstrating their opinions about health care reform at a town hall meeting called for the express purpose of airing that topic.
The Davis Rally drew an estimated 1,300-1,500 people, including vocal conservative and liberal protest groups.
Incidentally, Sheriff Gore used to be FBI, but is no longer:
Also, behind the scenes Americans are skeptical that Sheriff Gore should be using anything of this magnitude in light of his connection to the Ruby Ridge, Idaho incident.
Gore was part of the Federal Bureau of Investigation team and was believed to have issued the order to kill on sight – any member of the family who showed themselves, according to a source close to the case. This mishandling and loss of life resulted in Gore leaving the FBI. Two civilians were killed, an unarmed woman holding a baby as well as a minor child.
The debacle cost the American taxpayer $3.1 million dollars when a wrongful death suit was brought against the federal government. In August of 1995 the government paid the Weaver family of Ruby Ridge an out-of-court settlement.
h/t: Calitics





45 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
They don’t need these devices. There might be some mad people but is beyond the pale. Cops just love themselves new toys. They can’t be trusted with them.
Certainly, this sheriff shouldn’t be trusted with these toys, if anyone should. I kind of doubt that our police need these devices, but the MIC must be fed.
This is the same Sheriff’s department that when called to a Democratic fund raiser in tony La Jolla responded by pepper spraying a 60 y.o. woman.
what is it with the heavy-handed law enforcement in San Diego, anyways?
Sick-ins/Stay home general strikes do not require protesters to take huge risks with personal safety. Neither do boycotts.
Thanks. I was just going to ask that.
here’s an earful for the sheriff:
Sonic Youth
Back when I was a kid I had a popgun and so did some of my brothers. Not sure if we could trust the SDSD with popguns.
I knew that’s what this stuff was really for the minute I heard they were testing it in Iraq.
Notorious authoritarian stronghold since forever. You WILL comply, citizen.
Lots of DFHs with free speech druthers?
I am completely unsurprised to see these weapons marketing and sold domestically. That MIC doesn’t grow without new sales somewhere.
Any town that would hire that “retired” FBI guy is one I’ll stay far away from, thanks.
Thing is, SD is about the least likely place for any significant anti-authoritarian demonstration. Folks like that just don’t move to SD in significant numbers ’cause the vibe there is so icky. There are colleges and universities, but the absence of any youth movement for health care reform nationally doesn’t make that much of a threat. So I’m left with a big WTF on why San Diego, why now, for this weapon deployment.
Word. These are the folks who had nice beefcake pics of them with their paramilitary toys. Not surprised at all its S.D. but, lets put it this way: I’m not getting anywhere near that place if I can help it…
Nobody ever was held accountable for the police riot at Francine Busby’s fundraiser, right?
What is it about these people?
Back in the early 1970s, New Hampshire Gov. Meldrim Thomson
wanted the NH National Guard to have nuclear weapons,
presumably also for crowd control.
Skeered of browns?
HEAR HEAR.this has nothing to do with “public safety” and more about public injury. we’ve all been waiting to see what kind of death apparatus comes home from the imperialist foreign wars and this is one good example. im expecting to hear any day now that mercenaries are manning remote piloted “sonic” cannons, from a bunker under goldman sachs
Because they can? After all, what good are the toys if no one knows you have them?
Especially when the toys are probably also a form of compensation.
My thought exactly. San Diego is a big military city, with a lot of retired Republican residents. They take their Homeland Security very seriously, as if preparing for martial law. SD city government seems to view itself as a pioneer in the use of oppressive public tactics. A few years ago, just waiting for a plane at the airport was creepy-scary, with roaming armed guards and repeated ominous announcements about how anyone may be searched at any time.
The militarization of civilian police forces is the newest cancer from the Military Industrial Complex, they want to expand their market to make more blood money. And police forces love buying shiny toys. The final irony is that a lot of them are using Homeland Security grant money (read: our tax dollars) to buy this anti-civilian weaponry.
“San Diego Sheriff Bill Gore”
Umm.. this is the hand-picked successor to (and long-time Under-sheriff of) arch-thug “Indian Casino” Kolender, whose basic management philosophy was identical to that of the Sheriff of Notthingham (use office for personal thievery combined with gratuitous human rights violations). This was the same office that disrupted that Busby Dem campaign fundraiser in Encinitas with illegal entry, pepper spray, and an assault helicopter. The Kolender-Gore approach to miltarized law enforcement can be summed up thusly:
http://www.policehelicopterpil…..ter.jpg?__
I disagree with Hmmm.. This city has a reasonably good tradition of political protest, including progressive protest. Running confrontations on the border effectively halted the Minutemen, and anti-war and pro-immigration-reform demonstration from 2005 to the end of shrubco drew tens of thousands. It just also has a tradition of rethug corruption, authoritarianism, politically-motivated policing, and law enforcement militarization. Growing up there, I can say that it was universally known that if you were poor and/or brown and rounded up by the sheriffs (and some, but not all, of the urban police forces), torture would follow arrest without exception… (an exception to this was Mayor Sanders, when he was SDPD chief, who did a good job, IMO, cleaning up and de-militarizing that agency).
I’d wager that Issa has a financial stake in this weapon. Just a guess, but it seems so likely.
This is a sickening report to read. This is just wrong.
Wrong. To keep Quebec’s expansionist tendencies in check. ;)
-G
Hi Loo Hoo, did you go to Issa’a town hall?
it’s just the way they are. To its credit, SDPD has gotten a lot better,thanks to reform started by the current mayor, Sanders, when he was police chief. People have some respect for him, for moving that agency toward more modern (community-based) law enforcement and for addressing ethnic tensions. The sheriff’s department remains barbaric (#22).
Very few nice things can be said about the sheriff’s dept when I was growing up there (albeit a good while ago, so things may have changed for the better). I remember that much of the urban Latino community used to be forced to live in a state of fear. They were routintely dragged off mass transit or just stopped in the streets and subjected to brutally conducted and illegal ID checks and searches. Unaccompanied children were often deported by “accident,” with the the sheriffs collaborating openly with INS, etc. Illegal curfews were frequently ordered. Individual sheriffs were rumored to be working with white supremacist-types in harassing brown people. We just assumed that teens taken by the sheriffs would be severely beaten. More amusingly, raids on parties (with illegal alcohol) would just end up with selective confiscation of beer kegs but without any other type of legal sanction for the minors – for it was widely known and ‘agreed’ that this was a type of ‘alcohol tax.’
by the way, LA is this way too, if not worse.
This has got to be made illegal. Wow…
I think San Diego citizens need to determine the Sheriff’s rules of engagement for using these devices at public demonstrations. Before someone gets badly hurt.
the sheriff’s dept is not answerable to San Diego’s citizens, and has not been for at least a couple of generations. Sure, the sheriffs (two guys in my entire lifetime, Gore is the third) are kind of automatically reelected but they behave with impunity once in office – not only with respect to police brutality but also in terms of what can only be characterized as corrupt conduct. And goodness knows how open those elections really are.
We need to e-mail or write our critters and protest this. They could outlaw the use of such weapons – if they wanted to.
Encinitas. The sheriffs fortunately have no jurisdiction in La Jolla, which is part of the city proper.
No, but I heard that there were 1000 people there and it was mellow. This is the first I’ve heard of this contraption being there though.
The local purchase, via federal taxpayer funded assistance, of such state-of-the-art military weapons is one way to keep the lowly-paid weapons manufacturers busy 24/7. No depression for them, I’m afraid. The US is the world’s leading exporter, and hence manufacturer, of weapons.
Oh, yes, such devices should be prohibited from domestic use. Among other problems, such as their inherent ability to do considerable harm as well as to coerce control, they require the continuing assistance of either DoD or weapons manufacturer training, service and support. We’ll never stop going to war here or abroad until such structural arrangements are undone or considerably reduced in number. If Harry and
SallyNancy were competent, this would be one more item on their to do list. I suspect it’s not even on their very expensive (but ready for export!) radar screens.I’m wrote Boxer and Feinstein about this. Ain’t right.
In writing to legislators, one should be aware (to avoid confusion) that NEITHER of these incidents occured in the City of San Diego. I believe that the two deployments occured in Vista, CA and Spring Valley, CA – two conservative jurisdictions that are covered by the sheriffs.
The devices were NOT used at the two town halls that took place in San Diego, nor were the used at another one which took place in the City of La Mesa.
Thanks for the correction & info, Blub. Didn’t mean that demonstrations are impossible there, just that they seem like such a small potential problem that they can’t justify this measure. Great job of explaining what else is going on, thanks much.
I was there and I saw it, but did not know it was an LRAD, it looked like a speaker that had been propped up on top of the gym. The sheeple were well behaved at their own (majority R in attendance) event, unlike at Susan Davis’ event.
also.. do we have any confidence that Gore’s thugs actually know how to use these WMDs of their’s… and that they’re not going to accidentally fry everyone’s brains or something?? ;-P
There’s info at the links in the post about the extensive training the SF Sheriff’s deputies got to operate the equipment, but I don’t believe it — since their explanations don’t really track with the manufacturer’s guidance.
he. ’cause these are the thugs you want operating sensitive equipment:
http://www.policehelicopterpil…..7360631522
we’re doomed. are brains are gonna get scrambled.
Perhaps people should compare the output of these devices to the Navy SONARs which are so often in the news. SONARS were often kept active in Vietnam to keep swimmers aware from anchored ships. The output level of these shipboard detection systems is generally admitted by the DoD to be in the range of 135-145 dB/uBar. Consider what they are doing to whales…
Incidentally, SONAR of this class does have a kill range for humans.
Remember when “60 Minutes” did a segment on the “active denial system” and tried to say it would be used on insurgents in Iraq?
Dumbass media, too stupid to figure it out.
The
The M-I-C silly, who do you think runs this county?