
A mess of naval personnel announcements were pointed out to me last week. There were all kinds of flag officers being shuffled around; it looked pretty inocuous to someone like me who doesn’t have particularly deep knowledge of the U.S. military.
But there among all the shuffled officers is one Brian Losey.
More specifically, Rear Admiral Brian Losey.
It seems he’s been assigned to the Horn of Africa. Here’s an excerpt from NavyTimes.com:
Rear Adm. (lower half) Brian Losey will be assigned as commander, Combined Joint Task Force — Horn of Africa, Camp Lemonier, Djibouti. Losey is director, combating terrorism, National Security Council, Washington.
Yeah. It doesn’t look like much, could make a proud parent puff out their chest, right? But there’s one helluva lot of something going on in those 30 words.
You see, RDML Losey has only been a member of the National Security Council since late 2007, under the Bush Administration. As a member of the National Security Council, Losey has been privy to a lot of top secret national security content related to counter-terrorism. He’s now being moved to a leadership position in a real hot spot of the world, where the Bush Doctrine of pre-emption and the Cheney "Black Flag Roach Killer" approach to counter-terrorism have been applied heavily throughout Somalia, Ethiopia and Kenya, with widely variable degrees of success.
And RDML Losey is both moderately young — published info indicates he may be less than 50 years old and a fairly recent 2004 Master’s graduate from the National War College — and a Navy Seal.
In other words, he’s intense, lethal and Bushie-approved with access to the uppermost echelons of power during the late Bush years; it’s a combination which would leave Karl Rove panting and weak at the knees.
He’s also going to be a commander of a Combined Joint Task Force. This suggests special operations teams comprised of personnel from multiple sources — DOD and CIA in concert with similar components from other nations — will be reporting to him, handling covert ops like those we’ve been hearing about for a couple of years, up to and including elimination of individual terrorists.
Remember the hue and cry from earlier this summer about the allegedly inactive CIA hit squads which former Vice President Dick "Deadeye" Cheney tried to keep on the down-low away from Congress’s prying oversight? There have already been assassinations carried out by special ops teams — but because they were military ops in the Global War On Terror theater, there was no prohibition against their efforts since they were labeled warfare. Rumor says sloppy at times and nearly botching diplomatic relations with friendly sovereign countries, but warfare nonetheless. There wasn’t any perceived need for oversight by Congress because it was warfare.
And the Horn of Africa is a place where this kind of activity will continue, even though the label GWOT has been excised from daily use by the current administration. Somalia’s condition as a failed state has made it not only a hive of piracy, but a haven for terrorists; as long as it has no coherent and legitimate governance, Somalia will be an attractive nuisance.
That said, one has to wonder whether sending in what appears to be an intense, lethal Bushie-approved Seal-type is the best long-term answer to the problem. We’ll have to give him the benefit of the doubt, but this situation bears close monitoring since Losey is an heir apparent to the Bush/Cheney legacy. Unless, of course, RDML Losey has a more positive answer to the question, "Who is Brian Losey?"
[Graphic: Horn of Africa via Wikimedia]





11 Comments
Spotlight
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal
Advanced search
This kind of shit is so absurd, not to mention pretentious:
Unfortunately, there’s plague of these people willing and able to exploit available cannon fodder for the corporatocracy.
Libbyliberal makes a great observation about Obama’s use of this arm of the government to get what he wants from Republicans to pass his health insurance bailout plan.
Link to libbyliberal’s excellent blog.
alinaustex,
US military recently killed the number two al Shabah dude ,and the same dude was was on the number two most wanted list for the embassy bombings in Kenya – Open sourced MSM is reporting also that members of his team have been arrested and turned over to Kenyan authoritiies .
And this morning there is report from the BBC that for the first time in many years a moderate Islamic government has been formed with some success in Somalia -which is directly taking on enedmic problems like food ,water , and shelter . This moderate government seems to be gaing popular support-especially now that we have rejected the GWOT “strategerry ” of using Ethiopian troops as our proxy in Somalia .
I guess we are all so jaded from eight years of the “Long war /gwot ” that we might not be seeing some successes from a differnt approach that Team Obama is beginning to implement . Rayne you are right about giving the new administration the benefit of the doubt . Could it be Obama’s addresss in Cairo is starting to pay dividends of greater cooperation from overseas ?
I remain skeptical, alinaustex. More data needed before I would conclude that good things are happening. In addition to a commander who was ID’d, vetted and prepared by the previous administration, we are still dealing with a media machine which presents equally vetted and prepared information.
Going to take more to convince me that all’s right. A lot more.
And even if things are improving, do the ends justify the means? I’ve read that people were being driven out of Somalia — not all of them “targets” — and into military backstops in Ethiopia and Kenya, where they were eliminated by special ops. Does a positive change in local governance ever validate this kind of effort? How do the locals feel about us after the targets have been removed?
Need more monitoring and more data.
alinaustex rayne @ 5
Totally share your skepticism -but was more or less wondering out loud if we might be seeing a better mission profile emerging from our new administration. One data point that may give pause for hope is that the new government in Mogadishu is apparently enjoying popular support(ie the clans are aligning with the central executive) . More data is needed particularly proof that we have been involved with the kind of wholesale slaughter that you suggests.
I would have thought that Gen Paetreus would not have allowed such a counter productive use of our military in the Horn of Africa -as allowing special ops to wholesale kill innocent civilians -that was supposed to be a lesson learned and further taught from al Anbar .
But yes agreed more data needed – it might take years of hard lifting to undue eight years of strategerry anyway .
Wonder if Rear Admiral Losey has his very own JSOC sap program he is now running out of that old french foreign legion base – that might be good to know -could be some Camp Nama taint left , and boy that would be really counter productive “
You know counterproductive like repeating old behaviors and expecting different results .
Here, read this article, keeping in mind that a number of respected names who report on the intel community believe the author to be a major suck-up. In other words, this may be a sanitized product — and who knows what was sanitized?
There are others out there who’ve written tangentially on the topic, providing confirmation by way of critiquing the presentation but not the content.
rayne@6
That article was dated -over two years old – I wonder more about current status -. And IMO the BBC-which reported among other outlets that the current Somali executive had wide spread support and is making objective progress in good governance – that same BBC is not a sucking up sanitized news outlet. But totally agree with you that we need more data -and we can only pray we “are not making the same mistakes , expecting different results “
LTG David Petraeus and Lt. Gen. James Mattis started the COIN Center. This is from their pamphlet in 2006.
*******
“As we prosecute the current campaigns in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Horn of Africa, and the Philippines, the military must also prepare for an uncertain security situation beyond the present theaters of conflict. It is a future that will be heavily influenced by global competition for declining natural resources, rapidly rising populations in underprivileged and underdeveloped areas, unstable economic markets, and the continuing resurgence of violent religious and secular ideologies challenging democracy as a credible political theory.
In such conflicts, victory will be gauged differently than in wars past. Success will not be measured by the quantity of ground seized or the number of casualties inflicted or POWs captured. Victory will be measured by the trust and support elicited from local populations and social order and stability established with minimum internal social oppression.Progress in COIN conflicts will be measured with enhanced host nation competency, capacity, and legitimacy. How stable an order is that is both satisfactory to its people and no longer poses a threat will be the final arbiter of success. “
http://usacac.army.mil/CAC2/CO…..mphlet.pdf
http://www.africom.mil/
alank, ty! what a nice rush to read that. much appreciated. :)
you are so right. the militarization is frightening. And Chalmers Johnson writes so much about the 800+ military bases all over the world. Liquidating a modest number would end our health care worries. What is going on. And the hypnotized, afraid of looking soft on terror Congress, just gives the military industrial complex blank checks.
Shock and awe. Corporatist exploitation using military. It horrifies. And our footprints in places. So huge the military compounds. The size of dozens of football fields. Environmental problems. Immunity from sexual assaults on civilians.
I was hoping Obama would emulate Martin Luther King. But he mentioned Ron Reagan again on Letterman, and the military thing is closer to Ghengis Khan.
Wow. Torture S.O.P. everywhere?
Interesting, that last graf, missed that; suggests it’s a special access program into which Wright wasn’t read. He didn’t have THE clearance.
alinaustex (7) — Wish I believed the BBC’s content couldn’t be gamed. There are no outlets which can’t be gamed, only those who are more or less likely to product manipulated content.