According to the New York Times and Congressman Joe Sestak, most people really aren’t concerned about the war in Afghanistan. What do you think?
|By: Josh Mull Friday July 30, 2010 3:36 pm|
|By: David Swanson Friday June 4, 2010 6:51 am|
100 Congressional Candidates and National Organizations Oppose War Spending No Matter What Lipstick Is Applied to It
|By: David Swanson Wednesday May 26, 2010 8:31 am|
Fifty-eight congressional candidates and 20 activist organizations are opposing any more funding for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and inviting more candidates, incumbents, and organizations to join them. The 58 candidates, from 25 different states, include 19 Democrats, 18 Greens, 17 Libertarians, 2 Independents, 1 Republican, and 1 Socialist.
|By: David Swanson Sunday May 23, 2010 7:45 pm|
Forty-six congressional candidates and 17 activist organizations released a statement on Monday opposing any more funding for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and inviting more candidates, incumbents, and organizations to sign on.
|By: Josh Mull Wednesday May 12, 2010 1:30 pm|
President Obama’s ineffective strategy is costing us billions of dollars and thousands of lives. Call Congress and tell them to support the McGovern bill to require an exit strategy.
|By: David Swanson Tuesday May 11, 2010 7:04 am|
Isn’t it time to call what Congress will soon vote on by its right name: war escalation funding?
|By: David Swanson Wednesday April 21, 2010 1:12 pm|
Congress is about to consider whether to vote for another $33 billion, not to continue but purely to escalate the level of war in Afghanistan by sending more troops and contractors. A No vote needs to be rewarded, and a Yes vote punished.
|By: David Swanson Sunday April 18, 2010 9:17 pm|
Congress will soon vote on whether to spend another $33 billion of our money to escalate a war in Afghanistan that makes us less safe, violates the basic rule of law, kills innocent people, puts our children in debt, empowers the oil industry, and protects the heroin industry.