The G-20 members should be selected by objective criteria, GDP rank based on purchasing power parity, rather than the way they were actually chosen, by the G-7 and/or the 1999 U.S. and Canadian finance ministers. Included is a chart showing how the proposed G-20 and the current one differ.
U.S./Canada Chosen G-20 vs. Objective G-20 (w/ chart) |
| By: fairleft Tuesday June 29, 2010 12:47 pm |
What’s Up With the Rainforest: Brazil suspends Amazon dam project targeted by Avatar director |
| By: jamesboyce Friday April 16, 2010 5:37 pm |
With the 40th anniversary of Earth Day just around the corner, a renewed sense of activism and attention is cast around the present state of our natural environment.
Take A Hike! |
| By: letsgetitdone Thursday March 25, 2010 11:00 am |
It looks like we’re approaching an inflection point of great danger in working through problems in creating Economic Recovery. The inflection point is coming because there has been little economic recovery both internationally and domestically, with some nations continuing to run large deficits, and a growing chorus from many, calling for austerity and Governmental budget balancing even though it’s well known that the consequences of these policies will be economic contraction and further hardship for all of us but the rich. The big question is: which way will nations that have debts held in their own sovereign currency like the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Australia go? Will they listen to the domestic and international deficit hawks (e.g. the ratings agencies, the IMF, the European Commission (EC), and various currency traders and hedge fund managers) and cause further contraction and hardship for their citizens, or will they tell the deficit hawks to “take a hike,” create demand from the public sector, where private sector demand is falling short, full employment, and healthy economies?
I can’t answer this question, but what they ought to do is stated quite clearly in a recent blog post by L. Randall Wray and Yeva Nersisyan. Here’s an extensive sampling of their views along with some comments.
Pushing for “Zero Tolerance” on Sexual Violence in DRC |
| By: RHRealityCheck Tuesday February 9, 2010 7:36 am |
There is no shortage of reports or data documenting the abhorrent extent of sexual violence in the DRC. Women are targets working in the fields. Women are targets walking home. Women are targets virtually everywhere.
Written by Ramona Vijeyarasa for RHRealityCheck.org – News, commentary and community for reproductive health and justice.
Weekly Mulch: Where is the Climate Change Bill? |
| By: TheMediaConsortium Friday September 18, 2009 9:11 am |
By Raquel Brown, Media Consortium Blogger


12 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About The Seminal