As pressure to end the war builds in Washington, supporters of the war in Afghanistan will invariably return to their strongest argument: the threat of Al-Qa’eda. However, a reasonable understanding of the terrorist organization shows that even Al-Qa’eda is not enough to justify a bloody and expensive occupation.
|By: Josh Mull Thursday July 1, 2010 4:17 pm|
|By: David Swanson Monday May 3, 2010 3:36 am|
Is it that you don’t know what war costs, or that you don’t know that it makes us less safe?
|By: washunate Monday April 26, 2010 9:01 am|
As a citizen, I’m ultimately responsible for the conduct of my government. As we talk about health care and financial services, I think it’s particularly useful to remember the core assault on the rule of law – our inability to prosecute the crimes of the past decade.
|By: seancamoni Thursday March 18, 2010 8:38 pm|
A lamentable double standard exists in America when, for committing like acts of violence, a Muslim man with an Arabic name is immediately labeled a terrorist, and a White man with a biblical first name and an Irish surname is not. Either these men are terrorists, or they are not.
|By: Masoninblue Monday March 1, 2010 8:40 am|
My Proposal For New Progressive Party Platform on War and International Justice.
|By: CTuttle Friday December 11, 2009 5:48 pm|
Numerous takes on Obama’s speech in Oslo…