In leaving an early-morning voicemail for Professor Anita Hill, insisting that she apologize to Clarence Thomas for “what you did with my husband“, Ginni Thomas has re-ignited scrutiny into Thomas’ testimony at his confirmation hearing. That scrutiny does not leave the Supreme Court justice in a flattering light. In fact, yet another credible witness has come forward today, adding one more person relating a nearly identical description of Thomas’ outrageous behavior toward women (pdf) and his obsession with pornography. With multiple victims of Thomas’ inappropriate behavior coming forward, the question now must be asked why we allow a Supreme Court justice to remain on the bench when it is clear that he committed perjury in his confirmation hearing by categorically denying confirmed events.
|By: letsgetitdone Wednesday October 20, 2010 11:57 am|
Remember Bill Clinton lying under oath about his relations with Monica Lewinsky?
|By: Cynthia Kouril Wednesday October 13, 2010 7:34 am|
There has been fraud in the creation of RMBS, fraud in the collection of mortgage payments, and fraud in foreclosure to cover up the first two frauds. This is not “sloppiness” and it can’t be fixed with contract law.
|By: Cynthia Kouril Sunday September 26, 2010 4:32 pm|
Dear AG’s in Ohio, Texas, Florida and California (and to the rest of you as well)
Let me make it easy for you. It’s much easier to find the wrongdoing if you know where to look